Author Topic: Trump to scrap NASA climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’  (Read 790 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SirLinksALot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,417
  • Gender: Male
SOURCE: MSN VIA THE GUARDIAN

URL: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-to-scrap-nasa-climate-research-in-crackdown-on-%E2%80%98politicized-science%E2%80%99/ar-AAkE8hm?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

by: Oliver Milman



Donald Trump is poised to eliminate all climate change research conducted by Nasa as part of a crackdown on “politicized science”, his senior adviser on issues relating to the space agency has said.

Nasa’s Earth science division is set to be stripped of funding in favor of exploration of deep space, with the president-elect having set a goal during the campaign to explore the entire solar system by the end of the century.

This would mean the elimination of Nasa’s world-renowned research into temperature, ice, clouds and other climate phenomena. Nasa’s network of satellites provide a wealth of information on climate change, with the Earth science division’s budget set to grow to $2bn next year. By comparison, space exploration has been scaled back somewhat, with a proposed budget of $2.8bn in 2017.

Bob Walker, a senior Trump campaign adviser, said there was no need for Nasa to do what he has previously described as “politically correct environmental monitoring”.

“We see Nasa in an exploration role, in deep space research,” Walker told the Guardian. “Earth-centric science is better placed at other agencies where it is their prime mission.

“My guess is that it would be difficult to stop all ongoing Nasa programs but future programs should definitely be placed with other agencies. I believe that climate research is necessary but it has been heavily politicized, which has undermined a lot of the work that researchers have been doing. Mr Trump’s decisions will be based upon solid science, not politicized science.”

Trump has previously said that climate change is a “hoax” perpetrated by the Chinese, although on Tuesday he said there is “some connectivity” between human actions and the climate. There is overwhelming and long-established evidence that burning fossil fuels and deforestation causes the release of heat-trapping gases, therefore causing the warming experienced in recent decades.

Walker, however, claimed that doubt over the role of human activity in climate change “is a view shared by half the climatologists in the world. We need good science to tell us what the reality is and science could do that if politicians didn’t interfere with it.”

It’s understood that federal government scientists have been unnerved by Trump’s dismissal of climate science and are concerned that their work will be sidelined as part of a new pro-fossil fuels and deregulation agenda. Climate scientists at other organizations expressed dismay at the potential gutting of Earth-based research.

Kevin Trenberth, senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, said as Nasa provides the scientific community with new instruments and techniques, the elimination of Earth sciences would be “a major setback if not devastating”.

“It could put us back into the ‘dark ages’ of almost the pre-satellite era,” he said. It would be extremely short sighted.

“We live on planet Earth and there is much to discover, and it is essential to track and monitor many things from space. Information on planet Earth and its atmosphere and oceans is essential for our way of life. Space research is a luxury, Earth observations are essential.”


CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE REST...

Offline jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,409
  • Gender: Male
  • Realistic nihilist
    • Fullervision
Atmospheric research is supposed to be the realm of NOAA anyway; to have NASA do it is redundant, even before we consider James Hansen hijacked it about 30 years ago now.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2024

Online mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,415
Atmospheric research is supposed to be the realm of NOAA anyway; to have NASA do it is redundant, even before we consider James Hansen hijacked it about 30 years ago now.
That's what I was thinking: why is NASA doing weather research when we already have NOAA and NWS? If he can shut down the stupid "manmade global warming" faux research, along with the "NASA's purpose is Muslim outreach" crap, great.
Support Israel's emergency medical service. afmda.org

Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0
Big ups for Trump if this is true. :thumbsup2:

Offline rodamala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,534
A few years ago I had only 2 youtube channel subscriptions... NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, and Smarter Every Day.

I grew weary of all the uploaded videos from Goddard having NOTHING to do with SPACE FLIGHT... Seriously, I swear to Christ, 8 out of 10 videos was about global warming, no exaggeration.

Perfect example of where an actual small-government House could deny funding for the Leftist agenda propaganda machine, but the Republican Party is absolutely worthless in those regards.


Online mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,415
Perfect example of where an actual small-government House could deny funding for the Leftist agenda propaganda machine, but the Republican Party is absolutely worthless in those regards.
Yep. Wishful thinking, alas.
Support Israel's emergency medical service. afmda.org