Not stirring anything, sir. Just making an observation and comment.
Just like you did right here.
But, please answer this question, @Bigun ?
In the end....did we need any of TBR's Nevertrumps' votes?
Hey, I'll answer that.
Nope, you didn't, so why even weigh in?
But for next time, you might consider that without our votes, Trump barely defeated a morose Democrat Party, deeply divided over Bernie and real Socialism versus the sycophantic media worship of an aging, infirm, drunken and worn out (excitement wise) felon with a screechy voice and more baggage than Livingston on Safari. Not even the concept that she would historically share certain organs with 51% of the population was enough to push her over the top as the first female POTUS. Nope, that will have to wait for someone more acceptable.
Given an energizing Democrat alternative and a better than normal turnout at the polls, I don't think even we 'nevers' would have had enough votes to carry the day, even if we'd been inclined to give them.
In a higher turnout election, I doubt we'd have made any difference for him, simply because we are determined to vote principle over person or party.
Remember that next time.