Seems to me the gist here centers around violence - is the Trump Mob more violent or less violent than the Hillary Mob?
If we were to be purely analytical about the subject we would need to employ a computer with the ability to tabulate violent incidents and designate blame to one side or the other. We would also need to define a time frame, the last 2 years, the last 20 years, etc. And lastly we'd also require some sort of concrete definition of what exactly constitutes a violent act.
Assuming that all could be done in a purely analytical fashion (it cannot) the net result would be an unbiased print out with 2 columns and a total at the bottom of each. Those totals would theoretically settle the debate. Because the computer removes emotion from the equation the net results would be about the best we could hope for as a definitive answer.
If it were only that easy we could settle a good number of debates in a similar manner.