I don't recall saying you weren't entitled to your opinion. Hastert used his power to abuse children. Mrs. tRump did not, nor does she have the power, to have people look at her any way they want to. In other words, she didn't make anyone look at pictures of her, that's on them. Besides I have seen some of her pictures and while it's not something I would have done, it's not illegal and nothing I have seen looks like porn to me.
I seriously doubt there's a person in this world who hasn't done something that they wish they hadn't done. Unlike the Clintons, she seems to have matured past it and I say good for her.
I'd be tedious and say prove she hasn't done anything, etc. but I won't.
I will say that we don't know her past very well, which is appropriate for most private folks, but she will be entering into public life (already has) as a representative of the United States of America, our "First Lady" if he gets elected. I'd wager that if the ad hadn't been posted by Liz Mair's PAC, most here would have had no idea about the extent of her modeling past.
So, frankly just because we don't know of anything is no guarantee nothing has happened that might be on a par with the hideous behaviour of some of the others involved in this election. Pretty does not equal good, any more than Republican equals being Conservative. She has lived well off her husband's notoriety/fame/celebrity and has done well with a boost from that. Considering the questionable nature of his business transactions and actions, her complete innocence is subject to question.