Eric Trump: David Duke 'deserves a bullet'

[Rivergirl]

Waiting for the pretzels to show up here and say the lil trumper was just joking.

[Wingnut]

Trumps not the kinda guy would light a cross on your lawn like Duke would.....  but he might just stop to toast a marshmallow on it.

[XenaLee]

Is it possible....?   That Trump spawn could turn out to be even worse than Trump himself?

Saying that someone deserves a bullet isn't something a Christian says.  It's something that just the opposite of a Christian ...or maybe even an anti-Christian would say.   Hmmm.....

[Wingnut]

Is it possible....?   That Trump spawn could turn out to be even worse than Trump himself?

You know what they say,
The turd doesn't drop far from the Arse

[Longmire]

We see how the Trump's really feel about people they don't like.

The KKK anyway...

[sinkspur]

The KKK anyway...

So it's OK to shoot people you don't like in Trump's America. 

This mafiosi family is not going to darken the door of the White House.  Ever.

[INVAR]

So it's OK to shoot people you don't like in Trump's America. 

Well, in Germany it was the Jews, in Stalins Soviet it was the Kulaks, I mean, when you are tasked with making your country great again -  you gotta start ethnic cleanings and genocide somewhere right?

Why not start with a group most people don't like in the first place?  Most folks will applaud it - and churches will sing a little louder when the cattle cars of screaming victims pass on by.

But the country will be 'great' again.

[Formerly Once-Ler]

With all due respect to my anti-Trump friends, I applaud Eric Trump. I think it is about time the Trump campaign made a public disassociation with the Klan, and if it was worded poorly, then it looks like some of that fine Wharton educatin' that Trump got rubbed off on his son.  Not every slip of the tongue is proof Trump wants to sell our children to the gypsies.

David Duke deserves demonstrative derision.  I would not say anyone deserves to be physically harmed on a public forum, but I'm hard pressed to feel sorrow for Duke or anger at Trump jr.

[LilLamb]

   I was there in 91, so I can't get involved in these' David Duke' things, I'm Bias, Honest, and probably thought of as a Racist, but in my defense, I watch the NBA.



 
https://chrisblattman.com/2016/03/13/13797/

It was the worst vote of my life and I'm not ashamed that I voted for the crook.  I prayed a lot before and my conscience is clear on that vote.  Eric Trump is an idiot for even thinking of saying that, let alone actually saying it.

[INVAR]

David Duke deserves demonstrative derision.

Derision is one thing.

Suggesting and possible incitement of an assassination - is quite another.

Which is why the reference to how Dictators normally deal with their societies' unwanted.

[Frank Cannon]

With all due respect to my anti-Trump friends, I applaud Eric Trump. I think it is about time the Trump campaign made a public disassociation with the Klan, and if it was worded poorly, then it looks like some of that fine Wharton educatin' that Trump got rubbed off on his son.  Not every slip of the tongue is proof Trump wants to sell our children to the gypsies.

David Duke deserves demonstrative derision.  I would not say anyone deserves to be physically harmed on a public forum, but I'm hard pressed to feel sorrow for Duke or anger at Trump jr.

Finally. A sensible response. Duke is about as bad as it gets. Who cares if anyone jokes about his demise. He's garbage.

[Smokin Joe]

Finally. A sensible response. Duke is about as bad as it gets. Who cares if anyone jokes about his demise. He's garbage.

While I have no sympathy for Mr. Duke's stance on some issues, he has the same Rights as the rest of us.

Such protections under our Constitution are not supposed to be subject to the fickle whims of any fraction, or even the vast majority of the electorate, but are Rights to be protected and extended to all citizens, whether we like them as people or not.

Gerry Spence defended Randy Weaver pro bono, not because he had sympathy for the man's beliefs (he didn't) nor because he liked Weaver (whom he found to be a disagreeable person, iirc), but because he felt that an egregious violation of Weaver's Rights had been perpetrated, one which could not be allowed to become precedent. Unfortunately, before that was adjudicated, the Waco Massacre (1) had been perpetrated as well.

If popularity or mere public sympathy becomes the metric by which we secure or are denied our Rights, I'd better start stacking sandbags and filling spare magazines tonight.

[Rivergirl]

Interesting to see the inner thoughts of some folks posting here.  Good to know.  Wondering if this is a place for me.
I cannot imagine justifying shooting anyone dead because of their odious beliefs.   Maybe it's time to say sayonara to this website.

[Cripplecreek]

Suggesting and possible incitement of an assassination.

Something that many of us have complained about the left doing for a long time.

Now the royalty of both sides sit in their ivory towers and try to incite their nutjobs to the violence they lack the courage to do themselves.

[Smokin Joe]

Interesting to see the inner thoughts of some folks posting here.  Good to know.  Wondering if this is a place for me.
I cannot imagine justifying shooting anyone dead because of their odious beliefs.   Maybe it's time to say sayonara to this website.

I find it interesting and even a bit disconcerting that people here would support summary execution of anyone based on whether or not they like what they believe. It is telling, perhaps, of the precipitous degeneration in political rhetoric this year, that there seems to be so much of that nonsense, and the mob mentality that has sprung from a particular candidacy.
Of course, anyone to receive capital punishment should be afforded a fair and speedy trial and be convicted by a jury of their peers first.