Please think about this. Don't just dig in your heels out of ego and habit.
Which is more danger to the future of the USA. A crude, lewd bombastic President who clearly loves the USA and would face a rabidly hostile press and suspicious Congress/Judiciary or a corrupt, lawless bribe-able President who clearly loves only her own ego and would have a slavishly adoring Press and a lap dog Congress/Judiciary?
Put the ego and rhetorical posturing of the last year aside and THINK. Republics start to die when the Politcal Elite can get away with discarding the rule of law. On Tuesday, you get ONE LAST CHANCE to bring the Clinton to account for their 4 decade history of corruption and lawlessness
If I had dug in my heels out of ego and habit, I wouldn't have voted for most of the GOP candidates since Goldwater. Reagan is an exception.
If we voted for Trump and he won by a landslide, for instance, it would lend a "mandate" to not only the man, but all of the vile acts of his campaign. I just can't lift my arm high enough to vote for that. This is a bridge too far.
Hillary has a well established pattern of criminality, and may not even survive a term, although I think she likely will if she can get an equally corrupt DOJ to Obama's.
Still, While she can pull pay for play, I'd continue in the steadfast hope that certain things would be concealed from her on a compartmented basis, and that she would not have the very best stuff to sell. OTOH, that information could be subtly corrupted like gas compressor designs clandestinely sold to the USSR during the Reagan era which allegedly led to a series of pipeline explosions and serious damage to the Soviet economy. I think we have enough patriots in the ranks to make sure that some very good looking but critically flawed 'secrets' get out while the good stuff is under lock and key.
Trump, however, has not had the sort of access to the type of secrets, the very best secrets, Yuuge secrets, that Hillary has, and his actions along those lines may well mirror hers. He hasn't had the chance to be the politician rather than the renter, and I'd imagine he understands that when the tally is made, the politicians can rent a lot more influence than those buying it will make, because there are so many more buyers.
But even more serious is the damage done to the GOP, the label of "conservative", and the concept of a Constitutional Republic by someone who has indicated it is unlikely they could pass an eighth grade Civics test on the Constitution. His actions are unpredictable, hers will fall within certain parameters or risk widespread bloodshed. Bloodshed is bad for business.
Her husband took good ol' boy politics to the next level, and she has refined the smoky back room with a few add-ons on a global scale. Money, money, money. That's a predictable motivation.
In his case, simple greed would be predictable, but with having been all over the map with policy in the past few years, I'm not sure his belief system is consistent to be something that can be prepared for. That's bad for business and the Republic.
I don't see that crude, bombastic man as loving anything but the accolades of sycophants and money. He is ego and profit driven, and while the latter is predictable, the former is not. There's the rub.
