While they were preaching equal pay as an issue, they knew the Clinton Foundation had huge discrepancies.
Fwd: Equal Pay - Foundation
From:robbymook2015@gmail.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com, cheryl.mills@gmail.com
Date: 2015-02-24 17:41
Subject: Fwd: Equal Pay - Foundation
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ian Mandel <ian.mandel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:19 PM
Subject: Fwd: Equal Pay - Foundation
To: Tony Carrk <tony.carrk@gmail.com>, Robert Mook <robbymook@gmail.com>
Guys - Given the story yesterday about pay equity at the State Department,
I wanted to flag something that came out of our research on pay equity at
the Foundation. There are huge discrepancies, and it wouldn't surprise me
if they went here next. See a summary below from Karuna.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Karuna Seshasai <karuna.seshasai@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:14 PM
Subject: Equal Pay - Foundation
To: Ian Mandel <ian.mandel@gmail.com>
Attached is the equal pay hit pulled from the Foundation book. Essentially
here are the key take aways:
3 out of the 11 highest paid employees of the Foundation are women.
Avg salary of the highest paid men is $294,157.50, while the avg salary of
the highest paid women is $181,576.66 ($112K difference)
Median salary of the highest paid men is $346,106, while the median salary
of the highest paid women is $185,386 ($190K difference)
Chart and citations are on the attached doc. And I included the original
2013 990, where the #s come from.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36077
You can download the data attachment at the link above.