Dunno, she accused her first husband of cheating on her while she was on TV. Something he denies.
Then you have no basis to try and equate the two of them.
You threw a host of insults at Newt (fat troll and so on) and implied she was innocent. I simply posted that her marriage history isn't perfect.
I don't know anyone who is perfect in any aspect of their lives. It's part of being human. But, as we see, Kelly doesn't seem to have Gingrich's morally bankrupt history.
As for the insults I threw, sure. I happen to share Dana Loesch's viewpoint on that kind of thing. Some people deserve to be mocked, and I don't mind doing it. If that makes me shallow to some, I don't really care.
Nobody's perfect. Trump is a serial womanizer. So is Hillary and her husband. The double standard she is applying is quite obvious.
But there are varying degrees of imperfection, or sin, or whatever you want to call it, correct? And it seems that Kelly doesn't even begin to approach the serial immorality of Gingrich and Trump.
There was no doubles standard. Bill Clinton isn't running for president, and there was no reason for her to accede to Gingrich's spittle-flecked demands that she parrot what he wanted her to.