Author Topic: #NeverTrump GOP Candidate McMullin Admits His Goal is to Prevent Trump from Winning (Pro-Hillary) (Read 9728 times)

Silver Pines · « **Reply #75 on:** October 23, 2016, 06:56:32 pm »

Quote from: aligncare on October 23, 2016, 02:10:14 pm

We are proud Trump SUPPORTERS. Not followers.

The term "followers" is reserved for people who continue to worship a candidate (Ted Cruz) who lost the primary – but is trying desperately to hang onto his reputation – so he has thrown his support behind the Republican candidate, Donald J Trump.

Those "folks," (worshipers of Ted Cruz) are followers.

@aligncare

Right, which is why so many of you use that creepy "Mr.Trump" when you refer to him.

Silver Pines · « **Reply #76 on:** October 23, 2016, 07:01:41 pm »

Quote from: Right_in_Virginia on October 23, 2016, 05:05:12 pm

Unborn babies weep.

@Right_in_Virginia

"I'm very pro-choice."

"But you wouldn't ban partial-birth abortion?" "No."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsOlXidHXRE

Silver Pines · « **Reply #77 on:** October 23, 2016, 07:05:45 pm »

@txradioguy, to be fair, that looks like a satire site, judging from the article titles in the right-hand sidebar.

goodwithagun · « **Reply #78 on:** October 23, 2016, 07:11:47 pm »

Quote from: mystery-ak on October 23, 2016, 01:23:12 pm

#NeverTrump GOP Candidate McMullin Admits His Goal is to Prevent Trump from Winning (Pro-Hillary)

Jim Hoft Oct 22nd, 2016 9:19 pm

This is what we expected all along.

The #NeverTrump GOP candidate Evan McMullin is working to eliminate Donald Trump and elect Hillary Clinton.

The #NeverTrump Republican candidate last week told reporters Republicans are racist.

The #NeverTrump movement hopes McMullin will steal enough votes from Trump for Hillary to win Utah.

more
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/nevertrump-gop-candidate-mcmullin-admits-goal-prevent-trump-winning-pro-hillary/

Can somebody PLEASE explain why Trump is going after McMullen when he could be going after Cankles? It's like he doesn't want to win!

Suppressed · « **Reply #79 on:** October 23, 2016, 07:24:27 pm »

Quote from: Right_in_Virginia on October 23, 2016, 06:28:54 pm

Protecting the unborn is nothing to joke about @Suppressed

@Right_in_Virginia

So what's with the big abortion push -- did Donnie explain in his talking points memo? Ever since the last debate and Laura Ingraham's ridiculous claim, it's been the push-of-the-day.

Was it some focus-group results, or somebody's last-gasp hope for the orange liberal to suck up to conservatives?

It's painfully transparent, as Trump supporters never seemed to care about Trump's pro-choice, pro-exception views when he ran against strong pro-lifers.

No, neither candidate is going to protect the unborn from the White House, so your point is moot.

corbe · « **Reply #80 on:** October 23, 2016, 07:39:52 pm »

Quote

Was it some focus-group results, or somebody's last-gasp hope for the orange liberal to suck up to conservatives?

BOTH

It started with his beautiful rendition of the Abortion Issue in his 3rd Debate, Of Course no one believed him then, either.

geronl · « **Reply #81 on:** October 23, 2016, 09:07:40 pm »

There is no lie the Trumpers won't offer.

musiclady · « **Reply #82 on:** October 23, 2016, 09:13:53 pm »

Quote from: geronl on October 23, 2016, 09:07:40 pm

There is no lie the Trumpers won't offer.

This one is particularly heinous, though....

It attacks the core of real pro-life conservatives and smears us all with Trump filth.

geronl · « **Reply #83 on:** October 23, 2016, 09:29:19 pm »

everyone knows Trump is not pro-life, even Ann Coulter said she didn't care if he performed abortions in the Oval Office as long as he bult a wall....

jmyrlefuller · « **Reply #84 on:** October 23, 2016, 09:50:54 pm »

Quote from: goodwithagun on October 23, 2016, 07:11:47 pm

Can somebody PLEASE explain why Trump is going after McMullen when he could be going after Cankles? It's like he doesn't want to win!

To maintain the two-party oligarchy that ensures people will vote for him against their better conscience. Losing Utah would be the ultimate humiliation for a Republican and a sign of the party's doom. Trump desperately wants to tie McMullin to Hillary so that he can control his dying party.

goodwithagun · « **Reply #85 on:** October 23, 2016, 10:08:09 pm »

Quote from: jmyrlefuller on October 23, 2016, 09:50:54 pm

To maintain the two-party oligarchy that ensures people will vote for him against their better conscience. Losing Utah would be the ultimate humiliation for a Republican and a sign of the party's doom. Trump desperately wants to tie McMullin to Hillary so that he can control his dying party.

And once again, you hit it out of the park.

Smokin Joe · « **Reply #86 on:** October 23, 2016, 10:10:00 pm »

Quote from: jmyrlefuller on October 23, 2016, 09:50:54 pm

To maintain the two-party oligarchy that ensures people will vote for him against their better conscience. Losing Utah would be the ultimate humiliation for a Republican and a sign of the party's doom. Trump desperately wants to tie McMullin to Hillary so that he can control his dying party.

Nailed it! Good post!

EC · « **Reply #87 on:** October 23, 2016, 10:25:26 pm »

Quote from: musiclady on October 23, 2016, 05:36:27 pm

Fascinating how people who fully support a guy who is pro partial birth abortion, supports PP, and wants the federal government to fund abortions, are now making the bizarre accusation that those of us who are deeply pro-life don't care about unborn babies because we won't support a pro-abort candidate.

What I find FAR more interesting is that it's a line of attack that wasn't even on their radar a week ago.

Seriously. Pick any Trump supporter on here. Go back 8 days in their posts, then start going back through their timeline, looking for posts about abortion. You won't find many.

musiclady · « **Reply #88 on:** October 23, 2016, 10:28:26 pm »

Quote from: EC on October 23, 2016, 10:25:26 pm

What I find FAR more interesting is that it's a line of attack that wasn't even on their radar a week ago.

Seriously. Pick any Trump supporter on here. Go back 8 days in their posts, then start going back through their timeline, looking for posts about abortion. You won't find many.

Obviously, they got marching orders, and faithfully followed them.

The stunning part of it is that they think anyone is fooled by this faux outrage about something they didn't give a rip about a week ago.

Chosen Daughter · « **Reply #89 on:** October 23, 2016, 10:35:05 pm »

Quote from: Right_in_Virginia on October 23, 2016, 04:38:32 pm

Please provide a link to this.

Well I knew I heard Trump himself say it. The satire site probably got their carpenter line right from Trump. Yes, they had fun with it. But Trump really did compare himself to Jesus at the dinner.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/21/at-charity-roast-donald-trump-delivered-what-might-as-well-be-a-campaign-eulogy/

"He was a carpenter for his father" He knew what he was saying.

HonestJohn · « **Reply #90 on:** October 24, 2016, 12:45:39 am »

Quote from: Right_in_Virginia on October 23, 2016, 06:34:24 pm

Honestly, John, it is not.

But now that you've met your obligation to attack the messenger, have you any thoughts on what I said?

You've had no concern about Trump's support of Planned Parenthood. Therefore, you are not a serious person to speak on this issue.

You've not spoken of it until this last month, either.

As for the message, its a desperate... last ditch attempt to get votes. Had Trump actually cared about this issue, it'd have been as promoted as his "WALL!!!!". IE: loudly and at every chance he got.

HonestJohn · « **Reply #91 on:** October 24, 2016, 12:46:57 am »

Quote from: CatherineofAragon on October 23, 2016, 07:01:41 pm

@Right_in_Virginia

"I'm very pro-choice."

"But you wouldn't ban partial-birth abortion?" "No."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsOlXidHXRE

And somehow, when Hillary says the same, Trump was 'offended'.

Trump must really hate his own views.

Self-haters are losers.

Bigly SAD!!!

HonestJohn · « **Reply #92 on:** October 24, 2016, 12:48:07 am »

Quote from: EC on October 23, 2016, 10:25:26 pm

What I find FAR more interesting is that it's a line of attack that wasn't even on their radar a week ago.

Seriously. Pick any Trump supporter on here. Go back 8 days in their posts, then start going back through their timeline, looking for posts about abortion. You won't find many.

Exactly!

Gov Bean Counter · « **Reply #93 on:** October 24, 2016, 01:48:01 am »

Quote from: HonestJohn on October 24, 2016, 12:45:39 am

You've had no concern about Trump's support of Planned Parenthood. Therefore, you are not a serious person to speak on this issue.

You've not spoken of it until this last month, either.

As for the message, its a desperate... last ditch attempt to get votes. Had Trump actually cared about this issue, it'd have been as promoted as his "WALL!!!!". IE: loudly and at every chance he got.

I wonder how many of Trump's "conquests" he sent to Planned Parenthood....

SunkenCiv · « **Reply #94 on:** October 24, 2016, 02:20:50 am »

Gosh, what a huge surprise.

corbe · « **Reply #95 on:** October 24, 2016, 02:22:49 am »

Welcome Back @SunkenCiv I can't speak for the rest of these reprobates, but I missed ya.

Smokin Joe · « **Reply #96 on:** October 24, 2016, 02:43:48 am »

Quote from: SunkenCiv on October 24, 2016, 02:20:50 am

Gosh, what a huge surprise.

Welcome back!

EasyAce · « **Reply #97 on:** October 24, 2016, 05:13:56 am »

"None of These Candidates" remains my presidential vote come November.

It's still the only vote I can cast in this sump of a presidential election that won't make me
want to barf.

Nothing anyone has said in the last few weeks has been persuasive enough to change my
mind. Besides, why would any reasonable man or woman want to be able to say their vote,
too, was responsible for putting any of these snakes in the White House.

(Yep. Once upon a time, political parties peddled snake oil. This year, they're peddling
snakes.)