I don't either.
I think most of them will fall in line with the new populist party that will be promoted by the new Trump news network that will be created after Trump loses the election. They will scream and yell and the Pubs will be a minority party in the near future, especially after they sign off on immigration reform with border control in name only.
Conservatism is in decline. It doesn't mean it's wrong, it's not. It's in decline because in order for it to thrive and grow it requires an educated population that believes in individual liberty, property rights and consequences for decisions that are made. We no longer have any of these qualities in abundance in this country. Talk radio use to be a source for serious intellectual discussion and like everything else has devolved into an emotion driven belief system. So it's no surprise when someone rejects the newly appointed political savior that emotional response is that person, or persons, supports evil incarnate. In this case the evil incarnate is hillary.
Where were these "high minded" talk radio folks when the nominee was being selected. Other than Levin, I don't remember any of them pointing out what a disaster it would be to nominate someone with no moral foundation and an inability to control himself when he's goaded by his opponent.
Conservatism, true Conservatism, (not 'being Republican automatically makes you a conservative conservatism') requires principles.
Without principles, without those absolute ideas of right and wrong, all is relative.
It is the difference between having a stake with markings on it driven into the bottom to gauge the rise and fall of the tide, and using a cork floating on the water as the 'best' to show when the water is high.
One will tell you what is what, unless disturbed by a major storm, the other will get you run aground.
Situation ethics is that moral cork, bobbing in the shallows.
