Lost in all this is the irony of a former casino owner complaining about a rigged game.
Strange but true--there is no need for the Casino to rig the game, statistically speaking.
Slots will return from 60-90%, depending on the state, casino, and machine. (which means that statistically, the house gets 10-40% of the money that goes in the machine, every time it goes through).
All those games have odds, and while individuals can 'play the odds' with some success, sometimes, the actual balance falls in favor of the house over the long haul.
So Peggy Sue from Pocomo might go to the Super Slots Casino, and pull the lever on a $5 token and hit a million. She will leave a winner. In the meantime, Peggy Sue's win will bring others flocking to the casino, where the overall take will increase, proportional to the amount played. For every Peggy Sue, there will be thousands of smaller dollar losers or folks who just broke even.
Amusingly enough, they will tell you of the big jackpots they won, and still come home with a lot less in their pockets (because they put it back in).
No need to rig it, the odds favor the house, and a smart Casino won't be dishonest.
Table limits and free drinks will limit the amount lost to savvy players, and the house gets a 'rake' on player vs player games (a guaranteed percentage).