Breaking: FBI in Revolt – Top FBI Official Exposes Massive Corruption Which Let Clinton’s Crimes Slide

[rangerrebew]

Breaking: FBI in Revolt – Top FBI Official Exposes Massive Corruption Which Let Clinton’s Crimes Slide
October 13, 2016 | The Free Thought Project | thefreethoughtproject.com | 2,948 views
 

by Jay Syrmopoulos

A high-ranking FBI official has blown the whistle on what they say was a politically motivated, top-down decision to not recommend Hillary Clinton face criminal charges for her mishandling of classified intelligence.

The anonymous source that worked intimately on the Clinton investigation told Fox News that FBI agents working the case, as well as DOJ attorneys on the case, unanimously believed that Clinton should have her security clearance revoked, with the “vast majority” believing she should be criminally charged.

“It was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked,” the senior FBI official told Fox news. “It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted. We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/breaking-fbi-in-revolt-top-fbi-official-exposes-massive-corruption-which-let-clintons-crimes-slide_102016

[bob434]

Sadly America just does not care- they apparently don't care that a felon is running for, and winning, the presidency- it's a great big "Meh- whatever" with America now- simply because she's a democrat- Does anyone here think that if donald had done these things that he would even be allowed to run for president? America and the media only care when a republican does these things- Just look at what our present administration has gotten away with for 8 years now--

[Oceander]

I think many of them do care, and if the Republicans had nominated someone other than a self-centered, unstable, serial sexual abuser, she'd be getting shellacked.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Breaking with an anonymous source huh?


This is nonsense. Get a real source and you might get my attention.

[txradioguy]

I think many of them do care, and if the Republicans had nominated someone other than a self-centered, unstable, serial sexual abuser, she'd be getting shellacked.

 

[INVAR]

Breaking with an anonymous source huh?


This is nonsense. Get a real source and you might get my attention.

"Real sources" are all owned and operated by the Ruling Class Oligarchy or they are foot soldiers in their agenda.

Alternative sources are the only places you are going to even get 'hints' of truth or reality from now on.

Everything else is a tool to shape the opinions of the people to accept the Agenda.

[livius]

I think many of them do care, and if the Republicans had nominated someone other than a self-centered, unstable, serial sexual abuser, she'd be getting shellacked.

I agree entirely. I read somewhere in my many sources (so I've forgotten exactly where) that the Clinton camp backed off on going after Trump more aggressively because they were afraid the RNC might finally be forced to replace him - and it would be impossible for Hillary to win against any other candidate.

[Doug Loss]

Breaking with an anonymous source huh?


This is nonsense. Get a real source and you might get my attention.

If the anonymous source allowed himself to be named, he'd be immediately fired, lose his pension, and probably be prosecuted for whatever they could think up.  And audited for the past 5 years of taxes, etc.  Do you really think anyone actually in the know on this stuff would put his name out there to have his life destroyed?  These are leftists we're talking about, you know. 

[Fishrrman]

scutter wrote:
"I think many of them do care, and if the Republicans had nominated someone other than a self-centered, unstable, serial sexual abuser, she'd be getting shellacked."

By Jeb ?
By Kasich ?
By Carson ?
By Cruz ?
By dancin' Marco ?

C'mon... give me a break!

[DB]

scutter wrote:
"I think many of them do care, and if the Republicans had nominated someone other than a self-centered, unstable, serial sexual abuser, she'd be getting shellacked."

By Jeb ?
By Kasich ?
By Carson ?
By Cruz ?
By dancin' Marco ?

C'mon... give me a break!

Denial runs deep with you. The only candidate to poll with higher negatives against Hillary throughout the entire election cycle was Trump. This election would have been a landslide for virtually any other Republican candidate. Hillary is hated by many - with only Trump surpassing her... F'ing brilliant...

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

If the anonymous source allowed himself to be named, he'd be immediately fired, lose his pension, and probably be prosecuted for whatever they could think up.  And audited for the past 5 years of taxes, etc.  Do you really think anyone actually in the know on this stuff would put his name out there to have his life destroyed?  These are leftists we're talking about, you know.

I'm not arguing but we need more than this. An anonymous source just won't cut it.

[DB]

It's right there in the Wikileaks email dump: Clinton campaign discussing how she was vulnerable to every candidate but Trump.

Giving Hillary her favorite opponent was some kind of brilliant strategy... Hillary worked with the media to promote Trump and his supporters fell right in line... And they have the nerve to demand that we follow them... Stupid is as stupid does.