They're both @ssholes and they're both monsters.
No. Hillary is a monster, Trump is an @$$hole. In order to claim Trump runs in the same league of Monstrosity as does Hillary, you will have to provide some examples of where he has committed the same sorts of illegal behavior and abuse of government power as she has.
And neither of them is remotely fit for the office. Pretend as you will, but Trump is utterly unfit and has repeatedly shown himself to be unfit.
The election of Barack Obama convinced me there is no longer a "fitness" requirement for the office of the Presidency. And while we are talking about "Fitness", does no one remember Lyndon Johnson? I can't think of a boorish characteristic that Trump has, which was not surpassed by LBJ.
The choice we are left with is which of the two candidates is the least unfit. Like I said, we have to use a negative scale on this one.
Nah. You just want me to tell you you're right. Unfortunately, you're wrong.
You don't have to tell me i'm right. I know i'm right because the facts demonstrate that I am right. I do not measure "right" and "wrong" on the basis of what people say, (argumentum ad populum) I use objective and rational means to score "right" and "wrong".
Pfft. I'm on record saying Hillary will be a disaster. The problem is that you keep pretending that Trump is a complete unknown (which makes you pretty gullible).
I pretend no such thing. I have a lot of predictions regarding how Trump will handle things, and I very much expect him to govern as a moderate Democrat. He will grow the state, but he will grow the state at a lesser rate than Hillary, and he may actually get the state to do some of what a state is *SUPPOSED* to do, such as to establish and guard borders, build up defense, and prosecute crime.
The hell he wouldn't. Putin would start pushing Trump's buttons on Day 1, as would the Chinese, the Iranians, and whomever else, just waiting for the tweet-storm that is sure to follow.
And on what do you base this claim? Do you remember when Reagan fired the air traffic controllers? Russia took serious notices of that incident, proclaiming that "Reagan is a man who means what he says." They accused him of being a "reckless cowboy" but they did not doubt he would do what he claimed he would do, and so they did not F*** with him.
I think Trump will be given some of that same consideration by the Russians and by the Chinese as well. After this bruising election, the fact that the man is determined and still fighting will probably convince them not to screw with him lightly.
Hillary, on the other hand, commands absolutely zero respect from anyone outside of the New York Liberal Democrat Media's control. Foreign leaders will have no compunction about humiliating her, and of course she will launch herself into a psychotic rage meltdown and do something horrible. (She already has a Napoleon complex.)
