Author Topic: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?  (Read 1764 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 384,729
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/09/30/haven_t_we_always_wanted_a_republican_nominee_who_fights_back


Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
September 30, 2016
Listen to it Button

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Do I have a sound bite on this? I do. Let me find it to show you how this works in a modified way. Yesterday when the Alicia Machado story took off on board a rocket booster and just occupied every news story for seemingly every hour of the day, I opened my program figuratively scratching my head. I said, "Is this right? Trump is a bully. Is that the story here?" We had this poor Miss Universe, who 20 years ago put on 60 pounds. She became unattractive, which is not really what you want for a Miss Universe pageant winner who's wearing the crown for a year. And the story was that Trump bullied her and laughed at her and made fun of her and called her Miss Piggy and it was horrible, and see what a reprobate he is and see how he hates women.

I said, "How in the world can we ignore Mrs. Clinton? You want to talk about bullying women?" So I went on to make the comparison to Hillary Clinton protecting the Democrat Party and her husband with all these women that Clinton did have affairs with and some of these women who claim he sexually abused or raped them. Mrs. Clinton was the one that came up, along with James Carville, and had a policy of destroying, intimidating, and bullying these women.

And I asked the simple question: How in the world can you do a story on Trump the bully with one woman 20 years ago, Miss Universe, and ignore a genuine, actual, real bully who has been bullying and mistreating women for 20 years? Now, in my world, that was a good counter. It was an excellent way of putting things in perspective and trying to point out the phoniness of this campaign that Trump is a bully, because Mrs. Clinton beats him in that category every day of the week.

She doesn't pay the women in her office the same thing the men make. Here is a woman who was irresponsible in her job as secretary of state, four Americans died. Here's a woman that ran the bimbo operations for her president when her husband when he was president and so forth.

Let's go to Fox News. This is Special Report with Bret Baier during the All-Star Panel. Columnist from the Washington Examiner Lisa Boothe about Trump bringing up President Clinton's past at the next debate. Because if you're gonna bring up Clinton's past with Lewinsky, then you bring up Hillary and the bimbo eruptions unit that she ran. Bret Baier says, "What about bringing up the Clintons' past and the possibility that that's gonna happen at the next debate as we take this down to a different level of the election?"

BOOTHE: I do think that it is fair to an extent, not for Donald Trump. I don't think Donald Trump should be a messenger. But to bring it up, I think, it's fair to an extent, 'cause Hillary Clinton can't say (sic) there and say that every victim deserves to be heard, deserves to be believed, uh, but then we know, it's been widely reported that she went after these women, that she dragged their name through the mud. So I do not think that there's hypocrisy there that should be addressed from the Trump campaign, but I don't think that Donald Trump should be the messenger 'cause I think that diminishes him and his candidacy.

BAIER: And Rush Limbaugh talked extensively about that point all day today.

RUSH: I did. I did. So here's Lisa Boothe on Fox News saying, "Yeah, yeah, it's a good point, but Trump ought not be making." Well, you know what Trump is? Trump obviously is somebody who's not gonna rely on other people to make it for him. This standard operating procedure where a Republican under assault doesn't return fire 'cause it's not considered mature; it's considered taking the bait?

Trump obviously doesn't believe this, and Trump obviously thinks, "Look, if they're hitting me like this, there isn't gonna be anybody defend me. There isn't anybody." Outside of the people he's paying, there aren't gonna be people to defend him. Well, other than me, but I do it (sigh) for different reasons. But hasn't a complaint, hasn't a lament for many years on the part of many of you been that when any Republican is under assault by a Democrat or the media, that they don't fight back and it ticks you off?

Bush never fighting back on Iraq. The Bush White House never fighting back on any assault they made on him, and he just hung in there. And yet his surrogates, talk radio and others trying to defend him but the media just drowned that out for four years, 24/7, harping on it. Here's Trump actually fighting back on it, which a lot of people have wanted the Republican nominee to do for years. And when it happens, all of a sudden we hear now, "Oh, oh, oh! Trump shouldn't be the one. Oh, no, that's not good." I'm sorry; Trump's an alpha male. He's not gonna sit there and let this kind of stuff go by and hope or count on other people. He's not gonna oppose that, but I think his attitude is that it isn't enough.

END TRANSCRIPT
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2016, 07:00:17 pm »
Rush is in love.
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline Jazzhead

  • Blue lives matter
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,593
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2016, 07:02:23 pm »
We want a Republican nominee who fights back, not one that just fights stupid.   Trump doesn't know when to fight, and when to keep his powder dry.   His vendetta against Machado is a foolish distraction,  which makes him look petty and small, not "tough".   
It's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2016, 07:04:30 pm »
When you are at a zoo and a monkey is flinging poo, do you:

1. Step away from the poo flinging.
2. Get a tranquilizer gun and subdue the monkey or do something to make him stop.
3. Drop trou and take a warm one right in your own hand to fling back.

Hint, for a normal, mentally fit, human adult, the answer is never 3.

Offline Resp3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2016, 07:04:32 pm »
Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?

Yes we want one who fight back. But yelling "Call Sean Hannity!! Call Sean Hannity!!" in a debate and advocating that we watch a sex video is hardly "fighting back".

Offline skeeter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,717
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2016, 07:13:07 pm »
Because tweeting inanities and dwelling on the trivial and tabloid isn't 'fighting back'

Offline Idaho_Cowboy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,924
  • Gender: Male
  • Ride for the Brand - Joshua 24:15
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2016, 08:45:58 pm »
Yes, but do we want a candidate that is up at 3 am telling the nation to watch a sex tape?
No, no, we do not.
“The way I see it, every time a man gets up in the morning he starts his life over. Sure, the bills are there to pay, and the job is there to do, but you don't have to stay in a pattern. You can always start over, saddle a fresh horse and take another trail.” ― Louis L'Amour

geronl

  • Guest
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2016, 08:49:35 pm »
Not one who fights back against conservatism, radio doofus

Online andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,770
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2016, 08:56:03 pm »
When you are at a zoo and a monkey is flinging poo...
It is a shame that Trump cannot distinguish between political argument and gratuitous insults. It is even more shameful that his enablers in the media keep encouraging what they know or ought to know is bad behavior.
"The most terrifying force of death, comes from the hands of Men who wanted to be left Alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over. -Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #9 on: September 30, 2016, 08:57:59 pm »
It is a shame that Trump cannot distinguish between political argument and gratuitous insults. It is even more shameful that his enablers in the media keep encouraging what they know or ought to know is bad behavior.

Flinging poo is good for ratings. This campaign is basically a Kardashian reality show. Buckle up buckaroos.

Offline roamer_1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 44,141
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #10 on: September 30, 2016, 08:58:01 pm »
the answer is never 3.

Dang it! Can I try again?

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #11 on: September 30, 2016, 09:01:53 pm »
Flinging poo is good for ratings. This campaign is basically a Kardashian reality show. Buckle up buckaroos.

Jerry Springer Show on steroids.  And no, Rush....."we" didn't always want someone that would fight back via insipid twitter wars and obsessions with personal attacks against women.  Maybe you did, but .....

No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline Taxcontrol

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
  • Gender: Male
  • "Stupid should hurt" - Dad's wisdom
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #12 on: September 30, 2016, 09:09:17 pm »
Not one who fights back against conservatism, radio doofus

 :amen:

Offline Resp3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
  • Gender: Male
Re: Rush: Haven't We Always Wanted a Republican Nominee Who Fights Back?
« Reply #13 on: September 30, 2016, 09:15:41 pm »
Flinging poo is good for ratings. This campaign is basically a Kardashian reality show. Buckle up buckaroos.

Here is as good a place to post this pic as any....