Oh, and Castle is an insane conspiracy slip and fall lawyer who thinks Merkle is Hitlers daughter and that 9/11 was an inside job.
Frank, the remark about Merkel was made in this article:
http://www.castlereport.us/islamic-terror-little-history-2/#more-2665He was blasted for that on Red State in Neil Stevens' article, which appeared on 'Before Its News' (Same article, if you click on the contributor info. Just posted different places, not different sources saying the same thing)
http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2016/08/02/darrell-castle-conspiracy-theorist-attacked-ted-cruz-early/However, Castle responds to those allegations in this article (still up):
http://www.redstate.com/diary/blbennett/2016/08/09/constitution-party-candidate-darrell-castle-speaks-theblaze-tv-today/ (article by Bob Bennett)
Pat: We’re trying to get to know you, and we came across this very unflattering article about you. It talks about conspiracy theories…. Do you think Angela Merkel is Adolf Hitler’s secret daughter?
Castle: Well, I don’t. Regardless of what that article says, I’m not mentally ill; I’m not insane. The writer of it might be called into question, but I did a podcast a few months ago concerning Muslim immigration into Germany and Europe itself, and in that podcast I said that Mrs. Merkel is so concerned about being a descendant of Adolf Hitler—and by that I meant that he’s chancellor of Germany and she’s chancellor of Germany and she’s very conscious of that and she acts in a manner that she’s trying to live that down by total acceptance of immigration into Germany. That’s all I meant.
Yes, he is a personal injury attorney.
If some incompetent surgeon removes parts which you are fond of that didn't need to be removed, or if some bleep runs a red light and t-bones your car, you might want one of those some day, too. They aren't all 'ambulance chasers', and there are legitimate personal injury cases.
On supposed 'birther' attacks on Cruz:
I’m not a birther; I don’t know where Barack Obama was born…I think Senator Cruz—as I’ve said many times—is highly qualified and if I had been a Republican, which I’m not, I would’ve voted for him in the primaries.
(same article
http://www.redstate.com/diary/blbennett/2016/08/09/constitution-party-candidate-darrell-castle-speaks-theblaze-tv-today/)
While the Libertarians call him a 'troofer' the truth he seeks is the disclosure of the unreleased 28 pages of the 9/11 commission report, the ones which deal with Saudi Arabian involvement. (14 of the 17 hijackers were Saudis, after all). He never said 9/11 was an inside job, just that we don't have the full report.
http://www.castlereport.us/twenty-eight-pages/Or you can read his take on ISIS here:
http://www.castlereport.us/islamic-terror-little-history-2/#more-2665Frank, if you are looking for a man to follow, what will you do in four or eight years? Especially if you don't agree with his party's platform? Won't that be the real indicator of what you can expect, (with the exception of maybe the GOP?).
Candidates come and go, and unless some really crazy stuff happens, Castle won't win.
But advancing the Constitution Party Platform and growing the Party's influence is the agenda, and I am all for returning to using our Constitution as the framework for our Federal Government, downsizing that government, asserting our sovereignty, and returning power to the States and the People, and removing decisions on our soil form the hands of international agencies, including the UN. That includes the power to regulate abortion at the State level, which would limit that slaughter even if it does not stop it completely. My vote for Castle is a vote to do just that.
It is your vote to cast or not as you will.
I just want to make sure you have the whole picture, and I disagree with the Stevens article which I do not think was fair to Castle. YMMV