@HAPPY2BME
No, that's all your candidate could talk about.
That was also all Hilarious Rodent Clinton could talk about either. She was so obsessed about the body shaming
side of it she never once thought to bring up Ms. Machado's other legal issues, even though Donaldus Minimus
likewise dropped the ball by focusing strictly on her body (which is really a non-issue) and saying nothing
about her old legal issues.
Now, in fairness: Ms. Machado has not been formally convicted in any court of law for any crime so far as anyone
knows. And there is other evidence to suggest that she hasn't exactly been a one hundred percent model
citizen. It's said she was once engaged to former baseball player Bobby Abreu, an engagement that croaked
after she was seen having sex with another participant on a South American reality television show and Abreu
broke the engagement. She is also thought to have had a child fathered by a member of the Mexican drug
cartel known as Los Nagos, though she first said the father was a Mexican legitimate businessman before
Mexico's attorney general revealed the actual paternity.
Fair enough. Those are lapses in judgment, not crimes. But it's telling that a) Hilarious Rodent Clinton chose
to focus on the trivial issue of her body; b) Donaldus Minimus chose to wrestle back on that issue alone,
without once reaching toward the other character issues that might have gone farther to undermine her
credibility as a Clinton supporter than does bringing up crimes for which she was never, so far as is known,
prosecuted in any court; and, c) that some of Donaldus Minimus's supporters choose to lean on the
unprosecuted charges instead of the actual character issues.
Clearly enough, both candidates grasp at straws and do nothing much more than expose themselves both,
further, as absolutely and without reservation unfit for the presidency.
