Ted Cruz: #Never Hillary

[TomSea]

Some states are going red no matter what, some swing states, Trump is winning like Ohio and Iowa and Colorado.

Some states are turning into swing states, there is a close margin in Michigan, Pennsylvania and so on.

[TomSea]

The Constitution Party is great, principled, conservative; but I'm not sure if there best effort has ever gotten anything more than 3% let alone 1%.

By the way, Constitution Party candidate from 2012, Virgil Goode endorsed Trump some time ago.

[XenaLee]

This post summarizes everything you and your clique are about. Holding that vote over our head so we'll grovel. Many of you are here to carry Hillary's water, or are radical 3rd party voters that will have no measurable influence on the election.

You should have picked a candidate that had a chance of winning the nomination. What does it say about Ted Cruz's electability that he couldn't beat Donald Trump? What does it say about how in the minority you are that you have had no influence on the election so far? Ted Cruz is not standing in solidarity with you...he is standing with Donald Trump.

It's for certain that Cruz couldn't compete with Trump re: all of the damned Democrats that crossed over and voted for Trump.  They would NEVER have done that and voted for Cruz.  So in a sense, that is correct.  Bottom line, Trump had help from leftists re: winning the nomination away from Cruz and the other nominees.  Trump was their (leftist Democrats) candidate of choice.  And here we are.  Screwed.

[wolfcreek]

Yup, I'm selfish.  It's my vote, to cast as I will.  You have no right to decide for me what I should do.  Go vote for your Dear Leader and leave the rest of us alone.

If you want to be left alone, stop posting ideas for the Clinton campaign.

[wolfcreek]

Hah.  If Trump loses, you'll blame it entirely on us.  That's a guarantee, and you know it's true.

But we're screwed presidentially no matter who wins this time.  That's why I'm working to get a convention of states called, so we can limit the ability of any president (and the federal government generally) to harm us.  Did you really think this presidential election was the end of all things?

Because you bought into this defeatism.

Yes, at this point in time when [as Ted Cruz said] the SCOTUS hangs in balance, so do your precious principles. They will be made illegal should the court swing wildly lleft.

[wolfcreek]

It's for certain that Cruz couldn't compete with Trump re: all of the damned Democrats that crossed over and voted for Trump.  They would NEVER have done that and voted for Cruz.  So in a sense, that is correct.  Bottom line, Trump had help from leftists re: winning the nomination away from Cruz and the other nominees.  Trump was their (leftist Democrats) candidate of choice.  And here we are.  Screwed.

Could it be that those "damn Democrats" that wasted their vote on Trump could be future Republicans? Could it be they saw the light regarding a third Obama presidency?

Stranger things have happened. They happened for Reagan.

[INVAR]

If you don't vote against her. you're with her.

I'm voting for Castle.  You say that I'm with 'her'.


Fine.


According to you 'I'm with her'.


What do you intend to do about it big guy?

[wolfcreek]

I'm voting for Castle.  You say that I'm with 'her'.


Fine.


According to you 'I'm with her'.


What do you intend to do about it big guy?

Are you challenging me, Keyboard commander? 

[INVAR]

Are you challenging me, Keyboard commander? 

What are you going to do about the fact I am not voting for your prince wannabe keyboard warrior?

[wolfcreek]

What are you going to do about the fact I am not voting for your prince wannabe keyboard warrior?

Let you wallow in irrelevance. You won't be happy with either result. 

[INVAR]

Let you wallow in irrelevance. You won't be happy with either result.

How magnanimous of you to let me wallow in 'irrelevance'!

Has as much impact as someone insisting my congregation and I must embrace homosexual marriage or be forced to wallow in irrelevance because everyone else in the country is on board the Love Train.

I'll take 'irrelevance' happily in the midst of such a crooked and perverse generation.`

[HAPPY2BME]

Or get major payback.

Or get hunted down by dogs.

Or be 'peppered full of holes'.

Or be lined up and shot for 'treason'.

Or 'all of the above'.

===========================

After taking away your 1st, 2nd, and 3rd amendment rights (plus giving the internet up to UN control - THAT is exactly what Hillary (would) do for all you neocons.

In spite of your best efforts, both Hillary and you will FAIL.

[Doug Loss]

If you want to be left alone, stop posting ideas for the Clinton campaign.

Ah, the standard cry of the left and the populists--you disagree with me, you need to not be heard!  Sorry son, not gonna happen.

[Doug Loss]

Because you bought into this defeatism.

Yes, at this point in time when [as Ted Cruz said] the SCOTUS hangs in balance, so do your precious principles. They will be made illegal should the court swing wildly lleft.

This is, of course, a load of crap.

[Doug Loss]

Could it be that those "damn Democrats" that wasted their vote on Trump could be future Republicans? Could it be they saw the light regarding a third Obama presidency?

Stranger things have happened. They happened for Reagan.

It's much more likely that they saw that Clinton couldn't lose the nomination and decided to make sure the least electable Republican they could imagine got the nomination.  Any "Reagan republicans" have left the Democrat Party long since.

[Doug Loss]

Let you wallow in irrelevance. You won't be happy with either result.

So if we're "irrelevant," why are you Trumpenfaithful so insistent on denigrating anyone not paying proper homage to your Dear Leader?  It's as though you consider us apostates, who have fallen away from your religion.  We never subscribed to your form of worship, though.

[Doug Loss]

===========================

After taking away your 1st, 2nd, and 3rd amendment rights (plus giving the internet up to UN control - THAT is exactly what Hillary (would) do for all you neocons.

In spite of your best efforts, both Hillary and you will FAIL.

You know, your delusions are amazingly persistent.  In the face of unequivocal evidence that pretty much everything you say are lies, you continue to chant your dogma unabated.  It's almost Obamaite of you...

[INVAR]

After taking away your 1st, 2nd, and 3rd amendment rights (plus giving the internet up to UN control - THAT is exactly what Hillary (would) do for all you neocons.

Look, I know this concept is hard for people like you who rise and go to bed at the grant of government (which is why you want a king) - but NO ONE can take my 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th or 10th Amendment inalienable rights away - unless I surrender them first - which aint gonna happen.

Not without a fight.

Or their agents with guns to our heads insists upon obedience by force - in which case - we have a full-blown despotic tyranny and at that point maybe a few folks will realize what time it is.

In spite of your best efforts, both Hillary and you will FAIL.

Well, I hope Hillary fails as well as Trump.

I mean, only someone who wants a lifelong NY liberal Democrat running as a Republican would be stupid enough to think the rest of us want Hillary to succeed in making big government bigger and thus America Great again.

[NavyCanDo]

Navycando: #Never a NY Liberal

[wolfcreek]

Ah, the standard cry of the left and the populists--you disagree with me, you need to not be heard!  Sorry son, not gonna happen.

Your anti-Trump rhetoric is the"standard cry of the Left" But the hate has blinded you to that fact.

[LMAO]

If you don't vote against her. you're with her

So in your line of thinking, if people decide to simply stay home on election night, then they support Clinton. You have the same mindset as BHO when, after the 2014 mid terms, he stated something to the effect that he has to represent the people who didn't vote assuming those that didn't vote in the 2014 election supported him and his policies. Now, most reasonable people who even have a faint understanding of the system  understand that isn't the case


However, it sounds like you have very little understanding how an election works. So let me break it down for you. A vote for a candidate is a vote for that candidate. Not voting for a particular candidate is not voting for a particular candidate. If someone doesn't vote for anyone, then that means they don't support any of the candidates. See how simple that was?

Trump, nor anyone else, is not entitled to someone's vote

[wolfcreek]

So if we're "irrelevant," why are you Trumpenfaithful so insistent on denigrating anyone not paying proper homage to your Dear Leader?  It's as though you consider us apostates, who have fallen away from your religion.  We never subscribed to your form of worship, though.

I consider you unappeasable fringe voters at this point. But if one of you comes to your senses.....

If you had been here [and keeping up] you would know that my whole reason for my posting here is to stop the rhetoric that HELPs Hillary. In any way possible.

[wolfcreek]

So in your line of thinking, if people decide to simply stay home on election night, then they support Clinton. You have the same mindset as BHO when, after the 2014 mid terms, he stated something to the effect that he has to represent the people who didn't vote assuming those that didn't vote in the 2014 election supported him and his policies. Now, most reasonable people who even have a faint understanding of the system  understand that isn't the case


However, it sounds like you have very little understanding how an election works. So let me break it down for you. A vote for a candidate is a vote for that candidate. Not voting for a particular candidate is not voting for a particular candidate. If someone doesn't vote for anyone, then that means they don't support any of the candidates. See how simple that was?

Trump, nor anyone else, is not entitled to someone's vote

No, I understand that every vote for Trump is a vote against Hillary. Staying home and voting for people who don't matter is for pansies. 

[LMAO]

No, I understand that every vote for Trump is a vote against Hillary. Staying home and voting for people who don't matter is for pansies.

Staying home and not voting for either candidate because one doesn't care for their policies or just them personally is a personal choice just like one you made to vote for Trump. 

"Vote your conscience" is good advice. If you conscience says vote Trump, fine. If it says vote third party, or just stay home, it's all a personal choice.

I, of course, will not be voting for Trump for the simple reason is his soft statism is not the fix this country needs. I get the appeal but as a Coolidge/Goldwater type conservative, he is just not my cup of tea. I was hoping, after securing the nomination, he would start campaigning on addressing our fiscal situation and limiting and shrinking the size and scope of the federal government which not only is he not doing but he is more than just a little hinting at growing it further. I don't hate him, and should he win, which is a good possibility he might, and starts to prove my skepticism wrong, I will become a happy and eager supporter of his in 4 years.

He is not entitled to my vote just because he is not Hillary Clinton. Also, his over sensitivity and need to respond to every insult and criticism is disturbing

[Doug Loss]

Your anti-Trump rhetoric is the"standard cry of the Left" But the hate has blinded you to that fact.

You say "hate," we say "clear vision."  Comme ci comme ça.