I don't want to engage with you at all because anyone reading your post history can see you duck and dodge every fact I handed you. There's no point in doing it again.
You didn't hand me a single
fact. You offered opinions masquerading as facts, and absolutist predictions as to what would happen in the future. I called you on it, and that was it.
The great divide in this election among conservatives comes in trying to predict what Trump would do if elected. The vast majority of us recognize that as an unknown, and so we debate it. But you have reduced that unknown to a stark choice where your prediction of his future actions is
inarguable, and therefore, anyone who votes for him to try to keep Hillary out of office must be a liberal because they must desire the results
you are convinced will result from his election. To say that argument is full of logical holes would be to give it too much credit -- there really isn't any logic to it at all.