No seeming to it, you very clearly dodge the context of the discussion and have I have little hope that you intend to address the subject at hand. That being that Trump supporters have repeatedly made almost as many outrageous statements about Trump, his abilities and what he would be able to accomplish as President as he has. That when Trump supporters are confronted by the outrageous nature of their statements they like Trump have not back off, but doubled down as to the accuracy of their assertions and savagely attacked those pointing out the fallacy of their contentions and have dueled to the death over supporting their statements of delusions.
I don't dispute that at all, nor am I dodging the point.. There are a lot of Trump supporters who say incredibly stupid things, and are as ridiculously thin-skinned as he is. I have called some of them out on this very site in the last couple of days, but honestly, it's a point that's been beaten into the ground for months now. I suppose that's a fun issue to keep batting around if your goal is to score points against the "other side", and there's no shortage of material. So there -- your point addressed.
But my concern in this thread -- which I expressed long before you addressed me -- was the danger each would present after being elected. So given that you chose to comment on a post of mine that wasn't directed to you, and that was on a different subject, how about you doing me the equivalent courtesy of addressing my point? I'll ask it again, in case you've forgotten.
Which do you believe is more likely to actually occur?
A) If Hillary is elected, she will 1) appoint progressive justices who will grant constitutional protections to much of the progressive agenda, and 2) loosen voting and immigration restrictions so as to enable the casting of votes by millions of new voters who should not be eligible; or,
B) If Trump is elected, we will all "be forced to bow down to him", and everyone who didn't vote for him "will be hunted down with dogs."
Which of those do you think,
in reality, is the more plausible scenario?