Just because Donald Trump calls a chicken a dog does not magically convert all chickens into man's best friend. The label itself of limited value because people didn't agree on the definition even before Trump... The rest is semantics.
Just because there is no scientific fact to back up the claims of man-caused Global Warming doesn't deter the vast majority of the people on the planet who buy into the fraudulent hoax as legitimate. It is accepted as fact by the majority. Same thing is happening to Conservatism.
Just because we do not consider a liberal to be a conservative does not belay the fact that a vast majority of people believe it to be so. Heck, the majority of the people in this land cannot even agree on what the definition of liberty is, ESPECIALLY among those who self-identify as Conservative.
Is he? Do you think he is?
It is irrelevant what I think. I'm a minority. The vast majority claim that he is and believe it DESPITE the facts of his history and his own words. Perception IS now reality for the vast amount of those who vote.
Saying ridiculous things like that just demonstrates that you have no serious argument.
Well, people said I was nuts and ridiculous when I stated that smokers would find themselves banned from lighting up in public places back in the early 80s too. They convinced themselves that the state needed the tax revenue and would never quasi-criminalize smoking.
Leftists call themselves 'progressive' and get away with it. Trump calls himself a Conservative, despite his record and words and a vast majority believe he is. Why is it ridiculous to suggest Hillary could call herself a Conservative in the future and get away with it? Who gives a rat's ass what you and I think, it's what Joe Sixpack and the legions of low information voters think.
This isn't a serious argument, so it essentially amounts to you just conceding the point.
Except history teaches that despotic regimes and fundamentally transformed societies REWRITE history to suit their agenda and program their subjects.
Everyone at one time said the editors at the Munich Post had no serious arguments to make either.
They were proven right in time.