@musiclady
All true,but I believe the it is generally accepted these days that the alleged Republican Party is the party of conservatives,which as you pointed out is a sick joke.
Likewise the Dim Party is identified as the "party of liberals" by most these days,and nothing could possibly be further from the truth. They are the part of Left-Wing Facist Dictatorship,which is about as far from "liberal" as it is possible to get.
Kinda ironic that the Dims identify themselves as liberals since to everyone but the uneducated being a "liberal" in the United States means being politically conservative because our Founding Fathers were "liberals" in the true sense of the word.
Also kinda ironic that the alleged Republicans of today pretend to be conservative,when the truth is they are Fascists that would have been completely at home under the dictatorship of King George of England,and were as giddy as schoolgirls under the command of King Jorge of Texas by way on Connecticut.
To quote that great Dim thinker Goober Gore,"Whut iz spossta be up is doawn,and whut iz spossta be doawn iz up!"
Not that any of it really matters at this point since the Dims of today and the alleged Republicans of today are the same critter that just play bait and switch on the ignorant voters.
I used to think that the only thing that can save America would be a new party,but I have now evolved to the point,OR the country has DEVOLVED to the point where what we need to survive is TWO new parties,with both of them putting the preservation of America first always.
I disagree that the Republican party has ever been the "party of conservatives." They have only been the place where conservatives could find a level of agreement.
And I'm not really sure it has devolved so much. Who was more liberal, JFK or Nelson Rockefeller? Who was more conservative? Debatable, right?
What I see is that the number of principled conservatives in the Republican party has diminished in the past 10 or so years. We have sent many representatives to DC who seemed to be principled but who change rapidly when they become part of the Washington cesspool.
What has happened, IMO, is that with this particular nomination, the blurry line that used to be there has been scrubbed away, and now, at the national level, there IS no distinction.
I know you disagree, but there was a qualitative difference between George W. Bush and both algor and jFkerry. There was a difference between McCain and Romney (as bad a candidate as they both were) and Obama.
Now there is NO difference whatsoever between Trump and Hillary.......... which is why so many of us who were hanging on in the Republican party have now left it.
This year is different.