I personally don't subscribe to the idea that the military will be better off on his watch than Clinton.
I'm not saying worse, just not better.
A man who can't accept responsibility for even the tiniest things just isn't going to accept responsibility for lives that WILL be lost on his watch. It is effectively the same reason Clinton refuses to accept responsibility for lives lost in Benghazi.
In that regard, the military will face 4-8 more years with a CinC unable to accept responsibility.
As a green platoon leader, it was drummed into me that everything my platoon did, or failed to do, was my responsibility. That lesson really struck home, when on the first day of being assigned as a platoon leader, they were picked for an ARTEP (tac eval). Thanks largely to my inexperience, we flunked it, and I caught hell for it.
It was one of the best learning experiences of my life. After a couple of weeks of catching crap, I said, "Ok, I get it. If my neck's on the line, then stay out of my way." Over the next 18 months, I would lead three other platoons successfully through ARTEPs, my last one with the youngest platoon in the battery: 3 of 4 squad leaders were "acting jacks", E-4s. In fact, ours was the only platoon to pass in a battery level ARTEP. Those were good times.
That's where I'm coming from.