NY Post runs naked pics of Trump's wife... again

[mlizzy]

I've noticed that you seem to be a little obsessed with Melania.  Don't worry, she'll be available soon ... if you have enough money.

Ha! Good one @Emjay ~ and most likely true......

[Suppressed]

This is one of the most pro-Hillary Clinton websites in the world.

Name a single pro-Hillary poster here, with proof.

You might find one or two.  Maybe.

[Suppressed]

Listening to Rush, he said the NY Post has been pro-Trump; so why were these photos published?

As a distraction from this affair with Kahn or something like this.

I thought the NY Post (called Compost by detractors) had been hospitable to Trump, so I was wondering what was up with this. So, I hope I'm not repeating what has already been said here.

It gets the issue defused while nobody is paying attention, rather letting opponents control the releasse.

[NavyCanDo]

This is one of the most pro-Hillary Clinton websites in the world.

You're the one who posted this story about another release of naked Melania photos, not us. If anyone here is causing Trump damage it is YOU.
 
An no I don't think you will find anyone here that would vote for Hillary under any circumstances, but we will not be voting for your vile Oompah-Loompah either.

[Frank Cannon]

====================================

Let me call Rupert Murdoch and ask him why he did it.

He did it because your boy is a professional loser and all around dumb ass. The Pro-Trump NY Post is trying to change the subject from the increasingly embarrassing and damaging war Donny is having with a dead soldiers parents.

[NavyCanDo]

Expect a third edition with the lesbian photos that are now showing up. The NY Post may be pro-Trump but the mighty dollar speaks loudly. 

[Chosen Daughter]

And interestingly enough, a paper that endorsed Trump. I guess they think this helps (and a case can be made for that).
http://nypost.com/2016/04/14/the-post-endorses-donald-trump/

In todays society sex sells so it probably doesn't hurt him at all.  He wasn't too ashamed to have her take naked pictures on his plane for GQ.  I would say he should thank them.  It never bothered him before that she was nude in magazines.

[Frank Cannon]

It never bothered him before that she was nude in magazines.

It seemed to bother him in the Primaries....

[Luis Gonzalez]

This is one of the most pro-Hillary Clinton websites in the world.

Are you friggin' insane?

AIN'T NOBODY here is wanting to see any nudes of Hillary.

[Chosen Daughter]

It seemed to bother him in the Primaries....

Are you sure?  I think it just was an opportunity.

[Frank Cannon]

Are you sure?  I think it just was an opportunity.

He lost WI by wide margins because of this fight. Drug out the Primary even further. Donny is compelled to get into inane fights that end up blowing up in his face. It's who he is.

[Dirt for sale]

Goodly women do not paint their faces, nor gaily expose their buttocks to the telescopic lens.

[GtHawk]

She is way better than the average American woman..way better and at age 47 yet and those nudes were done for modeling.



@Resp3

I really don't care what the nudes were done for, now she is potentially the First Lady, and I don't care about looks, though there are plenty of Trump supporters that think her looks are are a reason he should be elected. And while you seem to have disdain for American women, I know more than a few American women that are her age and as far as I am concerned much more attractive. I'll end with I am not going to vote for someone for President based on what their spouse looks like, after all looks can be bought with enough money and the right surgeon...........No I am not saying that Trumps wife had work done.

[Neverdul]

When they slammed Beck for saying it, they knew he was telling the truth.

Beck was excoriated in some conservative media circles for bringing up that “the First Lady would be the first to have posed nude in lesbian porno shots.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/03/23/flashback-glenn-beck-attacks-melania-trump-as-lesbian-porno-model/

I was even convinced that the fully full frontal nude and girl on girl photos that have been floating on the net for years, were not of her, just someone who looked a bit like her.

Beck it would seem was right all along.

[Mod1]

Please keep it clean.  It's early so I modded with a broad brush and just deleted the offending posts and the replies to the offending posts.

[ConstitutionRose]

I really don't care what the nudes were done for, now she is potentially the First Lady, and I don't care about looks, though there are plenty of Trump supporters that think her looks are are a reason he should be elected. And while you seem to have disdain for American women, I know more than a few American women that are her age and as far as I am concerned much more attractive. I'll end with I am not going to vote for someone for President based on what their spouse looks like, after all looks can be bought with enough money and the right surgeon...........No I am not saying that Trumps wife had work done.

She's an attractive woman, but I've always thought she looked a little hard, a lttle dissatisfied.  Like smiling doesn't come easy.  Maybe outside the public eye she is more relaxed.  I just naturally keep a distance from people who have to search for their smile.  Experience  says those individuals come down on the toxic side.  In her case it may be sheer unhappiness.

[Jazzhead]

Name a single pro-Hillary poster here, with proof.

You might find one or two.  Maybe.

Pro-Hillary?  I doubt it.   Prepared to vote to defeat Trump?   Yes, some of us will do what we must.   Here's Bret Stephens in this morning's WSJ:

  There's a saying that in politics there no permanent victories - and no permanent defeats. . . . [But that] doesn't mean there is no permanent dishonor.  Huey Long, Charles Coughlin, Alger Hiss, Joe McCarthy and Bull Connor are the foul names of America's 20th century, and always will be. And those who supported and excused them will always be tainted by associations.

This is where Republicans now find themselves with their presidential nominee. Of all of Donald Trump's vile irruptions . . . his casual smear of Ghazala Khan is perhaps the vilest. . . . What makes Mr. Trump's remarks so foul is their undisguised sadism. . . . He degraded her . . .

It will not do for Republicans to say they denounce Mr. Trump's personal slanders; his nativism and protectionism and isolationism; his mendacity and meanness and crassness; his disdain for Constitutional protections - and still campaign for his election.  There is no redemption in saying you went along with it, but only halfway;  the with Mr. Trump you maintained technical virginity:  To lie down with him is to wake up with him.  It's as simple as that. . . .

Politics is mostly the business of maintaining popularity in the here and now.  Not always.  Come January, Mrs. Clinton will likely be President.  Whether there is still a GOP that can still lay a claim to moral and political respectability is another question.  Mr. Ryan and other go-along Republicans should treat the Khan episode as their last best hope to preserve political reputations they have worked so hard to build. 

Stephens is right -  the time for choosing is now.   Trump's vile attack on a Gold Star family and the Russian connections to his businesses have created a gift for the GOP - now is the time to pressure him to step down and save himself.   Let Pence take it from here.   

[Wingnut]

Are you friggin' insane?

AIN'T NOBODY here is wanting to see any nudes of Hillary.

I might be interested in seeing some.
.. for purely scientific research purposes of course.

[EC]

She's an attractive woman, but I've always thought she looked a little hard, a lttle dissatisfied.  Like smiling doesn't come easy.  Maybe outside the public eye she is more relaxed.  I just naturally keep a distance from people who have to search for their smile.  Experience  says those individuals come down on the toxic side.  In her case it may be sheer unhappiness.

It's her eye shape, they are rather narrow like most Eastern Europeans. If she had rounder eyes, she'd be considered a stunningly good looking woman (I already do, but I'm accustomed to that beauty standard) by everyone. 

[andy58-in-nh]

I might be interested in seeing some.
.. for purely scientific research purposes of course.

Blindness can be induced by staring at the sun or by severing the optic nerve. Naked Hillary is cruel and unusual.

[Frank Cannon]

I might be interested in seeing some.
.. for purely scientific research purposes of course.

Really? Who are you...... Dr Mengele?

[Neverdul]

It's her eye shape, they are rather narrow like most Eastern Europeans. If she had rounder eyes, she'd be considered a stunningly good looking woman (I already do, but I'm accustomed to that beauty standard) by everyone. 

I've noticed that too, the shape of her eyes. But she isn't IMO doing herself any favors by wearing such heavy and dark eyeliner.  For a woman her age and for her eye shape, it just isn’t a good look. It makes her look hard and like she’s squinting all the time.

(Although some claim based on photos from when she was younger vs. now, that she's had some work done over the years – a nose job, breast implants and Botox injections.)

But I will not deny that she is still a very attractive woman.

Heck if I at age 55 could afford to go in for some "overhauls", I “might” too. (Naw – probably not).

Especially not the Botox or a face lift. I am fortunate to have inherited from my mother, her facial features and skin (no crow’s feet or laugh lines yet) and am often told I look a lot younger than my age.  While I still wear makeup, I’m not wearing nearly as much anymore, going for a more natural look.

[EC]

I've noticed that too, the shape of her eyes. But she isn't IMO doing herself any favors by wearing such heavy and dark eyeliner.  For a woman her age and for her eye shape, it just isn’t a good look. It makes her look hard and like she’s squinting all the time.

Never really thought about that, it's just what I lump in as "catwalk makeup" designed to look best under flash photography, but yes, it has an effect of making her eyes both bluer and narrower at the same time. Which is unfortunate as wide eyes=kind/innocent, narrow eyes=mean/cold in the parlance of Hollywood.

Honestly not sure about her having work done. Models tend to have pretty good control of their faces, and, thanks to Frank, I know the boobs look the same!  .
I'd have said so about a year ago regardless, then a daughter of a friend showed off her contouring skills with make up - that was both a shock and a revelation at what you can do (she's an actress and was designing the face of a new character).

[mlizzy]

I've noticed that too, the shape of her eyes. But she isn't IMO doing herself any favors by wearing such heavy and dark eyeliner.  For a woman her age and for her eye shape, it just isn’t a good look. It makes her look hard and like she’s squinting all the time.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3641678/EXCLUSIVE-PHOTOS-Casual-Melania-Trump-steps-mom-no-makeup-t-shirt-hours-glamorous-night-Donald-son-Barron.html

Looks much better here, imo. She trowels on too much make-up usually, and then looks harsh like you say. Of course [trying to live] with the Donald would make anyone look harsh/angry, regardless.


Melania Trump

[Wingnut]

Really? Who are you...... Dr Mengele?

Nah....
I was channeling my inner LAZ.  He'd hit anything!