To continue....Ted Cruz (my first choice) is not on the ballot. If one wants to continually denigrate Trump (you included) - the clear conclusion is that they prefer Hillary to Trump - because one of the two will be president, and she is who they are helping. Calling the Khans "puppets" is completely called for (I will not cheer for someone assisting tyranny,just because their son died fighting tyranny of a different sort).They allowed themselves to be used by Hillary. Their son was killed while killing radical Islamists - and Hillary likes the killers of radical Islamists to be killed. Khan trashed Trump for essentially saying we need to keep radical Islamists out of the US - he lied by calling it unconstitutional, directly out of the Hillary propaganda handbook; and his waving the constitution while putting his own ignorance of the document on display. They are puppets of Hillary.
Just so you know, I don't sit here waiting for you to "call for" specific comments; neither you, nor anyone else, is the arbiter of my thoughts.
Regarding the comments about Cruz's wife - Ted's campaign started that war. You can't have that one both ways.
I'm not voting for Hillary, either. I'm voting for Darrell Castle (Constitution Party).
As far as the ad with the GQ cover image of Melania,first off, there would have been no ad without the image, consensually obtained, model release signed, licensed for use. You can't blame anyone else for that.
Cruz replied when he heard about the ad "That's not one of ours."
In FReeperland the cartwheeling sh*t fit was that he did not "disavow" the ad, whatever that means, because "That's not one of ours." sure sounds like disavowing to me. Repeating Cruz' comment about the ad, and later the facts did not deter the tempest of crap that flew around the web and twitter over the ad, all (incorrectly) blaming Cruz because he didn't rent out every interstate billboard for ads decrying the ad or have skywriters put smoke trails over every major population center saying it wasn't a Cruz campaign ad. He just said "That's not one of ours." and dismissed it.
That was run by a PAC run by Liz Mair, who actually was a Rubio supporter but who was also quite anti-Trump.
Trump's response was to attack someone who had nothing to do with the ad, viciously, and when it came out that the Cruz camp had nothing to do with it, Trump doubled down and lied and redoubled his attack on Heidi.
His response was rash, vicious, and directed at the wrong person. When shown to be wrong, he not only did not apologize, but lied to justify continued attacks on the wrong people.
Now, if Donald Trump gets elected, and if some rogue Moldovan sets off a nuke in Key West, who is he going to nuke back in retaliation?
Will he get the facts? Or will he plunge into WWIII and lie about who started what?
I don't want him in my White House, thankyouverymuch.