Author Topic: Paris Bataclan Terror Attack: Six French Military Were Present, Instructed Not to Intervene, People Died  (Read 323 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Paris Bataclan Terror Attack: Six French Military Were Present, Instructed Not to Intervene, People Died
July 21, 2016 | Global Research | Centre for Research on Globalization | 418 views
 

by Prof Michel Chossudovsky

They were instructed according to their rules of engagement not to intervene, not to come to the rescue of the people inside the Bataclan nightclub or those in the street in front of the Bataclan. 89 people were killed, more than 100 wounded.

According to a Belgian news report (July 5), The night of the attack at the Paris Bataclan, November 13, 2015, six French military personnel of the Sentinelle Project (launched by France’s Ministry of Defense) were at the entry of the concert hall.

    They did not intervene because the circumstances [pertaining to the Bataclan attacks] did not meet their “rules of engagement”, according to cdH [Political Party] Member of Parliament (Député) Georges Dallemagne in a Tuesday morning statement [July 5] on Belgium’s RTL TV.”

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/paris-bataclan-terror-attack-six-french-military-were-present-instructed-not-to-intervene-people-died_072016

read more
« Last Edit: July 21, 2016, 05:01:20 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline SZonian

  • Strike without warning
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,712
  • 415th Nightstalker
"Just following orders"?

Good Lord man, your countrymen were being butchered and you didn't say "to hell with the rules"?

I do hope that the ROE's have since been modified or eliminated. 

This enemy doesn't fight conventionally and doesn't EVER follow any "rules of engagement" except to slaughter innocents.

No quarter should ever be given to these vermin. 
Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
That is one of those crazy situations that looks bad on the surface but is a no win situation for the soldiers. Yes, they should have intervened, but those issuing orders many not have realized the magnitude of the situation.  If they had ordered them to intervene, or even gave them permission, that could be seen as foreign military acting in another country and any problem with what they did could be an international incident as much as the terrorism was. Doubly worse if they were uniformed.

The soldiers should have just acted on their own without asking for permission like some of our soldiers did stopping an attack on a French train earlier.

geronl

  • Guest
Their leaders should resign for this

rangerrebew

  • Guest
"Just following orders"?

Good Lord man, your countrymen were being butchered and you didn't say "to hell with the rules"?

I do hope that the ROE's have since been modified or eliminated. 

This enemy doesn't fight conventionally and doesn't EVER follow any "rules of engagement" except to slaughter innocents.

No quarter should ever be given to these vermin.

Shades of Baltimore!