Will Trump Win in a Blowout?

[mystery-ak]

https://pjmedia.com/diaryofamadvoter/2016/07/14/will-trump-win-in-a-blowout/2/


Will Trump Win in a Blowout?
By Roger L Simon July 14, 2016

Let us hope and pray he is up to it because we have reached an amazing moment in all our lives. Imagine a truck plowing across Times Square the way that one did down the Promenade des Anglais. How many people would be mowed down?  It would dwarf what happened in Nice where, it has been reported, bodies flew like bowling pins.

Could it happen here? Of course. Was Barack Obama right to allow so many Syrian and Middle Eastern refugees to come to the United States virtually unvetted? Is Hillary Clinton right to actually increase that number by some huge amount? Are these two leaders crazy -- or sadistic?

more

[guitar4jesus]

His behavior after the convention will tell all...  We'll just have to wait and see.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Trump isn't leading in the polls, but he's certainly gaining at the moment. I hope he can keep his big mouth shut and maybe I can support him. Gary Johnson is my default choice at the moment.

[sinkspur]

No.

Trump is stuck at 38-43%.  HE HAS NOT MOVED BEYOND THOSE NUMBERS FOR THREE MONTHS. 

Hillary's been above 50 and is now around 40-44.  So, it's Hillary who is losing, due to the email scandal and the trust factor.

Trump is not gaining.   He cannot help himself; he'll go off script at some point, again, and remind voters that, the reservations they had about him in the first place, were well placed.

The election is still about Trump and that means he loses.

[TomSea]

We must pray and maybe fast, that abortion maniacs like Clinton or Johnson don't get in there.

[guitar4jesus]

Yes, at this moment I still see him as a stalking horse.  Like I said, his behavior during/after the convention will tell all.  He could change but at this point I just don't see it happening.

[jmyrlefuller]

Probably not.

He could still win—it all depends on how absolutely terrible Clinton is as a candidate—but to win in a blowout would require him to completely erase his (well-earned) negatives, a darn near impossible task.

[geronl]

We must pray and maybe fast, that abortion maniacs like Clinton or Johnson don't get in there.

Trump is no different.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

No.

Trump is stuck at 38-43%.  HE HAS NOT MOVED BEYOND THOSE NUMBERS FOR THREE MONTHS. 

Hillary's been above 50 and is now around 40-44.  So, it's Hillary who is losing, due to the email scandal and the trust factor.

Trump is not gaining.   He cannot help himself; he'll go off script at some point, again, and remind voters that, the reservations they had about him in the first place, were well placed.

The election is still about Trump and that means he loses.

Ok. Relative to Hillary he's gaining and that's what's important. I don't expect it to last long, he cannot keep his big mouth shut.

[Jazzhead]

Gary Johnson is my default choice at the moment.

Optimistically,  that's who I will be voting for.   But the first priority is to defeat Trump.   (And re-elect Pat Toomey.)

[jmyrlefuller]

We must pray and maybe fast, that abortion maniacs like Clinton or Johnson don't get  in there.

Our nation has been imploding on so many fronts and your biggest priority is an issue that hasn't changed in 40 years?

[TomSea]

Our nation has been imploding on so many fronts and your biggest priority is an issue that hasn't changed in 40 years?

It's changed a lot in states like Ohio, Indiana, Texas, Wisconsin, Kansas and so on.

9,000 Babies Were Saved From Abortions Under Texas Law Supreme Court Just Struck Down
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/06/30/9000-babies-were-saved-from-abortions-under-texas-law-supreme-court-just-struck-down/

That law may have been struck down, others have not been.

1 Clinic in Missouri and Mississippi in the whole of these states.

Clinics closing every week.

Yes, there have been big changes.

And these governors have been instrumental.

[Oceander]

in a word, no.

[INVAR]

"Win"???

When will folks comprehend what the term 'velvet coup' means?

Trump is Hildabeast's stalking horse, meant to help ensure the illusion of her trouncing is legit.

And if this November was legit, Trump would have his arse handed to him.

Rightfully so.

[Cripplecreek]

I think we should be looking ahead to 2020. 

[Oceander]

I think we should be looking ahead to 2020. 

Exactly.

[mlizzy]

We must pray and maybe fast, that abortion maniacs like Clinton or Johnson don't get in there.

Count me in! This is thee answer [and for Catholics, the frequent reception of the Sacraments], but unfortunately Satan has convinced [many] people there is no hope through prayer. (It is not true!) Keep praying!

[Doug Loss]

I think we should be looking ahead to 2020. 

Frankly, we should also be supporting and promoting the Convention of States project.  If we can't get an acceptable government, at least we can take a shot at minimizing its ability to harm us.

[Mechanicos]

Trump isn't leading in the polls, but he's certainly gaining at the moment. I hope he can keep his big mouth shut and maybe I can support him. Gary Johnson is my default choice at the moment.

Nate Silver was completely wrong 7 times in a row. Brexit polls were off by 14 percent on average. Several Polls have been exposed as nothing more then marketing firms for some politicians making up stuff to manipulate. The Original legacy pollster Gallop has stated its impossible to do accurate political polls. Many, many sources admit that the changing technology and public hostility to/distrust of media precludes representative polling.  When you dig down into the internals of all the modern polls showing the impossible - aka Hillary winning against anybody - you find they are online polls, weighted heavy democrat, light independents or just made up from nothing.

That people still believe in polls to be accurate today says more about their lack of reasoning ability then the known problems with polling today.