Defeated anti-Trump delegates vow trouble during the convention

[roamer_1]

As I said on another thread..
What if your candidate won, fair and square, and Mitt and his gang tried to railroad your guy?

Trump didn't win 'fair and square'. He won with lies, divisiveness, and character assassination.

Your point is moot, and all bets are off.

[HonestJohn]

Say what?

Australian ballots force the voter to rank the candidates, with a #1 choice, a #2 choice, etc.

If no candidate gets 50% or more, then the election officials remove the candidate with the least votes and try again.

[Fantom]

Trump = grass root primary voters choice. Anti-Trump LEADERSHIP = cheap labor Establishment.
Those are the facts.

trump=democrat crossover/losers/kkk in life voters.

Ted= Grassroots Teaparty(limited government) voters.

trump won a rigged election..and won at Convention with the GOPE.

[Sanguine]

Australian ballots force the voter to rank the candidates, with a #1 choice, a #2 choice, etc.

If no candidate gets 50% or more, then the election officials remove the candidate with the least votes and try again.

Ah!  What an interesting idea.

[Fantom]

Australian ballots force the voter to rank the candidates, with a #1 choice, a #2 choice, etc.

If no candidate gets 50% or more, then the election officials remove the candidate with the least votes and try again.

Just runoff the top two who do not pass 50%.

The problem with # 1 2 3 voting is that the results for 1 + 3 Could overcome #2 ...or 2 +4 beating # 1.

Just have a runoff of the top two if any fail to get 50% +1.

[Fantom]

Australian ballots force the voter to rank the candidates, with a #1 choice, a #2 choice, etc.

If no candidate gets 50% or more, then the election officials remove the candidate with the least votes and try again.

Link to procedures.

I have yet to see a progressive voting scheme include a 50% minimum.