Robert Spencer: Muslims wouldn’t bomb Muhammad’s city, would they? Sure they would.
July 6, 2016 4:52 pm By Robert Spencer 10 Comments
Over at PamelaGeller.com I explain why the latest attempts to exonerate Islam from responsibility for the crimes done in its name and in accord with its teachings founder on the facts:
The Islamic State (ISIS) attack in Medina shows once and for all that ISIS is not Islamic, right? After all, how could a Muslim group, much less a self-styled “caliphate,” set off a bomb in the city of Muhammad himself? That proves that ISIS has nothing to do with Islam, no? That’s what many Muslims would have us believe. Unfortunately, this is just more deception from practiced masters of deceit – and it’s deception that is increasingly dangerous and offensive as the jihad death count climbs ever higher.
Maher Zain, a Multi Platinum-winning singer and songwriter who is Muslim, wrote on Twitter to his 1.47 million followers: “Still need proof that ISIS is the foremost enemy of Islam? They attack the Prophet’s City. Terror knows no religion!” Boxer Amir Khan tweeted to his 1.75 million followers: “The attack in our beloved Prophet Muhammad’s city Madinah proves that Isis has no religion!” The UK Muslim broadcaster Mohammed Shafiq wrote: “The attack on #Madinah was an attack against all Muslims. We need unity against this evil.”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/07/robert-spencer-muslims-wouldnt-bomb-muhammads-city-would-they-sure-they-wouldREAD MORE
