That's not true. I've explained it to you already: the mass body of independents and non-primary voters would be more willing to vote for someone else in the GOP than they would Donald Trump. In every apples-to-apples comparison, other candidates polled better against Clinton than Trump did.
You have told your fantasy that has no relation to reality, yes. And with the record of predictions the antis have you guys do not even believe yourselves.
And you buy that NBC/WSJ is a poll. Its not its Marketing. Its Gas lighting for gullible people.
What you’ll see is: “Hart Research Associates / Public Opinion Strategies” these are not political polling firms. These are public relations firms. You can go here:
http://pos.org/ to see the origin of the data, and you can go here:
http://pos.org/clients/campaigns/ to see the clients they service.
From Their “About Us” Page – About half of our research is dedicated to winning elections. Our political client base includes thirteen U.S. Senators, six Governors, over sixty-five Members of Congress, and numerous state legislative caucuses. The other half of our work is involved in complex public policy battles, working with industry coalitions, government entities and private companies.
What you will discover is their clients are entrenched DC Politicians who have a specific and vested interest in the outcome of the election. Public Opinion Strategies is the outfit that runs their political campaigns and political messaging.
These are not media polls done to capture the mood of the electorate. These are tightly controlled scripts designed to sell a very specific reference. This is the professional political class controlling the information being fed into the media machine.
And the article in this thread is playing you for a fool by this non-poll. Tell me again about those polls...
