I had a period of my posting life when I just flat out refused to do Google searches for people. It was those few times it didn't make a darned bit of difference that wore me out. After a while, I compromised with myself and vowed not to make claims that I'm not willing to Google in the first place. Besides, I might find out I was wrong and I save myself an embarrassment. It slows me down but my responses tend to be more measured.
Unless I'm dealing with an Ahole troll. No rules about arguing with trolls.
@Cyber LibertyI gave it up several years ago after realizing there were political groupies on most boards challenging anyone that posted negative things about the candidate they really backed to provide links so the poster they challenged would waste time looking for several different sources for links,and then after posting them the objector would claim they were biased or outright lies,and demand more links. It was nothing more than a ploy to keep you from posting things they didn't like.
I also discovered that no matter what the subject was,you could find links that denied it happened or claim that it did. No matter what you post or the source of your link,nothing you ever post will be accepted as true by a true believer that is in LOVE with his own ideas,so why bother. This is especially true when it comes to links about polarizing politicians like those from the Bush and Clinton Crime Families. Their groupies are in LOVE,and there is nothing you can say,do,or post that will get them to change their minds.
The way I see it,it's enough to post enough details to provide the information needed so that anyone curious about it can do their own damn searches and make up their own damn minds. I have better things to do with my time that waste it trying to prove what I know to be right to someone that just doesn't want to hear it. They ain't paying me for my time,so they can damn sure find it themselves.