Our support for a candidate is a civic duty with the choices we've been given....no matter who we support by our vote.,
We have a choice to write in or vote a third party candidate that more closely represents our core principles and values.
and that vote does not mean we support their lifestyle, nor their manners or way of relating
And this is where we part ways. A little leaven, leavens the entire loaf according to the Apostle Paul and according to all human history and experience. CHOOSING rulers whose lifestyles, manners and character are antithetical and contrary to mine, empowers those lifestyles, vulgarity and lack of character to become preferred and predominant.
We have Obama and Hillary PRECISELY BECAUSE most Americans wrongly assume the same thing you do: that supporting lessor evil does not mean they support evil.
What they have done is leavened the entire loaf with a yeast that is corrosive to the existence of both morality and liberty.
Apparently few notice the correlation to the loss of liberty and the abandonment of the Constitution to the wickedness this people are indifferent towards in both society and the rulers they choose.
......it means we see the issues that come 'closest to' those we have concerns about and which candidate represents THOSE the best.
The graveyard of societies are filled with the corpses of former republics whose leaders grew more depraved and tyrannical as they devolved, until the people had no choice except tyrants or despots to rule them.
..so we each vote according to how we view our duty and our concerns...or not at all.
Between a tyrant and a despot, I choose none of the above and will cast a vote for someone I write in or is from another party.