You prove its not for services rendered to the campaign first. Until then this Democrat talking point for lo information people is done no matter how angry it makes you.
I never said it was not ("it's" not "its" BTW) for "services rendered" to the campaign. The question is the propriety and ethics of funneling 20% of Trump's campaign expenditures to Trump owned business when he is “loaning” money to his campaign and therefore can at any time up until election day, and using campaign contributions or GOP funds to pay himself back while pocketing the profits from the money his campaign paid to his own businesses.
There is also the question as to whether the cost of the “services rendered” were at fair market value or the most cost effective options. You made the claim that (he) “uses his own resources for the campaign instead of paying outside venders for stuff and saves money”, so I would ask you to prove these expenditures saved his campaign any money.
And you are purposely ignoring the facts I posted and spinning it into being a “Democrat talking point”. FWIW, I hold Hillary Clinton or any other candidate (Dem, Rep or Independent) to the same standard of ethics and transparency and the appearance of nepotism.
Again, if you want to discuss and debate the facts and the points, even if you disagree with them, I'm happy to do so. But as I’ve so often seen, you don’t. You just respond with smarmy comments, accusations that anyone who doesn’t bow down without question to the “anointed one” is for Hillary or you respond with crazy conspiracy websites - absent any facts to back up your position or your refutation of others’.
And if you are going to call me one of those "lo information people" at least spell it correctly – it is "low" not "lo".
And I am not angry because I didn’t donate any money to Trump’s campaign and will not. I am disgusted by it however.
And in truth, I am even more disgusted by Donald Trump than I am by Hillary Clinton.
I’ve long known what the Clintons are all about.
But Trump is supposedly now the standard bearer of the GOP and by extension of conservatism. He’s supposedly the outsider, the non-insider, a man of the people, champion of the little guy and the grass roots, self-funding, populist, against crony capitalism candidate. But how he manages or mismanages his campaign, proves to me that he is nothing of the sort.
I’ve come to the conclusion that Trump, while he may have delusions of grandeur of actually winning the election and becoming POTUS, his main motivation is to increase his fame and to line his and his family’s pockets.
