Nice sentiments, but they founder on the fact that Trump simply cannot be trusted and his past history is distinctly liberal. His words cannot be taken either at face value or even as a commitment, because he has admitted, in print, in his own book, that he says things for effect in negotiations - a candidacy is nothing more than a negotiation at bottom - without any intention of being held to those words or to the promises they appear to be. We have already seen how "promises" morph from day to day depending on the effect he thinks he can get from them: first it was a real, ocean to ocean wall, then it became a virtual wall, then it became something that wasn't a priority at all (according to what he told Ryan).
In the past Trump has supported liberal positions, like single payer health care, and has definitely come out in favor of the governments right to take an individual's private property and give it to other private companies because the government thinks the company would make better use of the property.
Finally, Trump's political milieu is distinctly liberal. He is of a type with Michael Bloomberg, another wealthy NYC businessman who became a republican at the very last instant, just so he could run for mayor; Bloomberg definitely governed as a big-government liberal. And they both fit into a larger group: the Rockefeller republicans; these are generally wealthy liberals who are too embarrassed to be seen in the same room with the unrich liberals who protest in the streets. Trumps family are also all NYC liberals, most particularly the son in law he is taking advice from on media matters: Kushner.
The only reliable facts say that Donald Trump is a political liberal - a Rockefeller Republican - and will govern as a liberal if elected, notwithstanding what he says, the same way that Bloomberg did when he was elected Mayor.
In other words, the only reliable facts say Trump will be just as liberal as Clinton. I prefer to base my decision on reliable facts, not on mealy-mouthed "truthful hyperboles" spoken solely because of their intended emotional effect on the listener, not because they represent anything real about the speaker. When I do that, I find that I cannot on principle support Trump because he will be just as bad as Clinton. The facts say so.