There Is No Other, More ‘Presidential’ Donald Trump

[aligncare]

Considering what the trumpansies worship. It is the absolute height of hypocrisy for any of them to be such precious snowflakes.

So, I guess we will have to refer to them as almighty wonderful Trump godlike..whatever.

It's nice to see the forum prohibition against personal insults is being enforced here. Hypocritical, much?

[Cowboyway]

Absolutely. There are plenty of new free republic arrivals who dropped the vitriol and speak to us Trump supporters like intelligent human beings.  Instead of Satan's seed.

The Trump loyalist left at FR brought that on themselves.  The lack of debate, the zot festivities, JR's irrational notion that only Trump can save the Union, the hatred of anything not Trump, the cultish atmosphere, the calls for a Trump dictatorship (which is what directly led to my opus), the Alinsky tactics, all cooked together have turned FR into an island of inbred zoo animals.

I used to laugh at the commies that worshipped 0bama but since most of them are atheist I simply concluded that they were looking for their 'god'. 

But it's hard to laugh at the so called 'conservatives' who worship Trump.  It's just downright sad.

[Oceander]

It's nice to see the forum prohibition against personal insults is being enforced here. Hypocritical, much?

A personal insult is one that is directed at you alone, or a very small group of people of which you are one.  A generalized group name is not a personal insult.  But if that's what you believe, then why are you insulting us in your signature line.  Your butt hurt comment is worse than some trumpansie name.  Heal thyself first. 

[Cowboyway]

Maybe we need an agreed upon word for each other; Cruzers/Trumpers for example, instead of any of the other names and in place of the longer Cruz supporters/ Trump supporters.

I think most of us can be respectful  and civil without enforcing political correctness on the site.  The simple solution for site members who are offended by certain names is to hit the ignore button.

(Personally, I'm not easily offended; I have the sensitivities of a toilet seat.)

[Cowboyway]

A personal insult is one that is directed at you alone, or a very small group of people of which you are one.  A generalized group name is not a personal insult.  But if that's what you believe, then why are you insulting us in your signature line.  Your butt hurt comment is worse than some trumpansie name.  Heal thyself first.

Don't you find it ironic that the Trump loyalists at FR refer to anybody that doesn't support their cause as 'snowflakes'?

[Oceander]

Don't you find it ironic that the Trump loyalists at FR refer to anybody that doesn't support their cause as 'snowflakes'?

Well, that's why I like it over here; haven't posted on FR in years.

[RoosGirl]

I think most of us can be respectful  and civil without enforcing political correctness on the site.  The simple solution for site members who are offended by certain names is to hit the ignore button.

(Personally, I'm not easily offended; I have the sensitivities of a toilet seat.)

I don't care about the names either, but if it keeps us from having to see all the stupid whining and keeps the mods from having to deal with the nonsense then it's helpful.  Besides that, I view it as the widespread use of profanity; it's unnecessary for intelligent people.

[skeeter]

That's a start....and how about people cleaning up their tag lines for example

If you want to be treated with respect start showing it to others or stop complaining

I'm glad someone else noticed that. Complaints about civility kinda lose credibility when followed by silly taunts.

[ScottinVA]

Please do not change the title of an article...

I certainly won't; I posted it.  Did someone attempt to change it?

[ScottinVA]

I for one will herein refer to Trump backers and just that:  "Trump backers." 

I reserve the right, however, to refer to Trump himself as "Orange Glorious."

 

[roamer_1]

Hmm...what to do...

Precious Trumpflakes, builders of ill-will to all Or Trumpkins formerly known as Trumpsters formerly known as Trumpettes.   Wait for this week's memo from Team Trump to find out what else we can no longer say.

Sooo... For all the blowhard's nonsense about being against PC, his supporters are among the first to get butthurt and try to control the conversation by throwing dirt in the air about harmless naming. How very politically correct.

It brings to mind an old saying - one my mother taught me well before kindergarten:

"Sticks and stones will break my bones, but names will never hurt me."

Maybe we should start there and quit being so overly sensitive.


**edit:syntax

[XenaLee]

But but.. a great huge wall.. with a wonderful huge door...

A huge two-way (revolving?) door.  Swell.

[XenaLee]

Sooo... For all the blowhard's nonsense about being against PC, his supporters are among the first to get butthurt and try to control the conversation by throwing dirt in the air about harmless naming. How very politically correct.

It brings to mind an old saying - one my mother taught me well before kindergarten:

"Sticks and stones will break my bones, but names will never hurt me."

Maybe we should start there and quit being so overly sensitive.


**edit:syntax

Excellent point.  Especially since....they seem to think it is A-OK for their hero, Trump, to call anyone that disagrees with him whatever names he deems appropriate.  Seems rather hypocritical to me.

[mystery-ak]

I certainly won't; I posted it.  Did someone attempt to change it?

This was added to the title *(The garbage you see is the garbage you get)*

[musiclady]

Excellent point.  Especially since....they seem to think it is A-OK for their hero, Trump, to call anyone that disagrees with him whatever names he deems appropriate.  Seems rather hypocritical to me.

That's what I don't get.  Why are people who love Trump because he's a "fighter" so tender themselves?  You'd think a dirty fighter like Trump would attract his own.  I guess it's a case of opposites attracting?? 

[ScottinVA]

This was added to the title *(The garbage you see is the garbage you get)*

Ah.. OK.  No parenthetical headline opinionating.  Roger that.

[roamer_1]

Excellent point.  Especially since....they seem to think it is A-OK for their hero, Trump, to call anyone that disagrees with him whatever names he deems appropriate.  Seems rather hypocritical to me.

Don't it though?
Thx for your reply.

[DCPatriot]

That's what I don't get.  Why are people who love Trump because he's a "fighter" so tender themselves?  You'd think a dirty fighter like Trump would attract his own.  I guess it's a case of opposites attracting?? 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ5KZ0gh2hg


Pay attention.....   

[mystery-ak]

Ah.. OK.  No parenthetical headline opinionating.  Roger that.

I rather not Scott...aside from being the wrong actual title it messes up the search function..

Thanks for understanding

[ScottinVA]

I rather not Scott...aside from being the wrong actual title it messes up the search function..

Thanks for understanding

[HonestJohn]

It's nice to see the forum prohibition against personal insults is being enforced here. Hypocritical, much?

Why don't you look up the definition of 'personal insult' and then think about what you are writing.

[musiclady]

Pay attention.....   

Except he's really not doing that, is he?  I mean, he's really not fighting for anyone other than himself....

And as I thought about my post further, I realized that being uber-sensitive is really being a lot like Trump, himself.

I have often compared his responses to those of a Jr. High girl, or a 5 year old of either gender.  He doesn't really have a backbone when you really look at him.

He's not going to fight for you, DC.  You're far better a fighter yourself than he is.....

[XenaLee]

That's what I don't get.  Why are people who love Trump because he's a "fighter" so tender themselves?  You'd think a dirty fighter like Trump would attract his own.  I guess it's a case of opposites attracting?? 

I don't know.  I have always noticed a glaring similarity between 'some' Trump supporters.....

and the very worst of the worst lefties that I have been attacked and insulted by over the past almost two decades.  Could it be?

[Suppressed]

I will take this one.

First Trump never said take from innocent. His original quote which I have hammered at the dishonest ones said in addition to a watch list they are known enemies of State. That is far from innocent that's a legal classification of a crime.

Why would he ". . .be meeting with the NRA, who has endorsed me, about not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns." if that's not what he meant.  Instead of "people", he could have said, "criminals" if that's what he meant.

Why does every statement of his have to have an army of minions come out and tell us that he didn't mean what he said?

2nd Trump spoke a truth of SOME US troops. How soon we forget stuff like this:
https://www.publicintegrity.org/2015/05/05/17268/us-military-personnel-have-been-convicted-50-million-worth-crimes-iraq-and

But, of course, Trump didn't actually say "some" US troops. 

And why does he wonder if we have caught and prosecuted those people?

Why does every statement of his have to have an army of minions come out and tell us that he didn't mean what he said?

So Trump is right on both of these issues and #neverTrump as usual has bad information and is attacking Trump just because ...

Nice try.

[Mechanicos]

Why would he ". . .be meeting with the NRA, who has endorsed me, about not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns." if that's not what he meant.  Instead of "people", he could have said, "criminals" if that's what he meant.

Why does every statement of his have to have an army of minions come out and tell us that he didn't mean what he said?

But, of course, Trump didn't actually say "some" US troops. 

And why does he wonder if we have caught and prosecuted those people?

Why does every statement of his have to have an army of minions come out and tell us that he didn't mean what he said?

Nice try.

And you refuted nothing. You know I am right and instead of admitting it doubled down on the dishonest reporting of what he was meeting the NRA for. Which by the way doubled down on the omission of what he said again.