What I am reading on my favorite defensive carry forum, and I am hoping they are right, is what this ruling does is keep in place the "May Issue" rather than "Shall Issue" that plaintiff originally sought. This is consistent with the rulings of the 2nd & 3rd Circuits previously. It's the media that is making it sound like a groundbreaking event. HOWEVER, with me living within the confines of the 9th Circuit, i.e., WA, OR, CA, NV, AZ, AK, GUAM, HI, ID, MT, and the Northern Mariana Islands, I will be watching where this goes. For we can clearly see that our gun owning California neighbors have been undergoing Death by a Thousand Cuts. They'll keep sniping at the 2A bit by bit, while they sleep till they wake up one day and the 2A will be a memory.
And what has been happening in CA is clearly visible here in WA. I can hardly buy a semi-auto without seeing these stickers plastered on the cases. In this example my XDs and XDm.