That has been discussed extensively in other threads on here. Hes pro-illegal, sits on a board that gives out scholarships to illegals, belongs to a lawyers group that is heavily interconnected with the Terrorist one including having its senior member sitting on a Council board. They cross link each other, they share social events with the same name. they both are boycotting Trump and opposing him officially because of his anti-illegal positions and building the wall. More but its been said already in other threads. He is not a good guy. Its wrong for conservatives to defend this Obama appointee.
Again, you are making an argument Trump himself did not make.
When was the first time Trump himself actually mentioned La Raza?Trump's argument was simple, and straightforward -- that because the judge was of Mexican heritage, he would be biased against someone who favored building a wall on the Mexican border. That's the exact argument he made, and he kept doubling down on it. The La Raza argument is the one raised by supporters of his -- who apparently are more knowledgeable than he is -- after he'd already directly linked the judge's ethnicity to his alleged bias.
This is one of the worst things about Trump. The country does need to have a discussion about
some of the Hispanic advocacy groups. Unfortunately, Trump poisons the well before the discussion can even get going by saying something stupid. Now, anyone who tries to make a point about La Raza will be blasted as a racist defending Trump's stupid statements.
