Al Gore’s Version of Global Warming DESTROYED in One Meme

[rangerrebew]

Al Gore’s Version of Global Warming DESTROYED in One Meme

by Katie McGuire | May 27, 2016 1:09 pm
 

Al Gore doesn’t seem to get that he is just DEAD wrong when it comes to global warming. This clown is such a hypocrite that he takes SUV’s and huge jets to speaking engagements – all supposed ‘evils’ in his environmental ‘safe space’. What a JOKE:

al gore 750[1]

Now, even our text messages are causing global warming? William Teach reports:[2]

This is a Big Question for National Democratic Radio, er, National Public Radio

    How Much Do Your Text Messages Contribute To Global Warming?[3]

    A few days back, All Tech got a question from an NPR listener that got us curious.

    Tim Callahan from Seattle wrote:

    “A friend asked how texting – in all its forms (admittedly a squishy thing to corral) – is contributing to global warming? After saying, ‘minimally…’, I thought about how to answer that question. Putting aside the sunk contribution caused by the manufacture and transport of the device you text with, how much does the battery emit / generate while a person does a typical or somehow average text? … Can you help quantify?”

    I tracked down someone who’d get us to the answer: greenhouse gas footprinting expert Mike Berners-Lee. Climate impact calculations are just the sort of thing he does for work at Small World Consulting[4] at Lancaster University in the United Kingdom. And estimating the impact of a text message is exactly the thing he did for his 2010 book[5] How Bad Are Bananas? The Carbon Footprint Of Everything.

I’ll make it easy for you: the answer is that the carbon footprint of texting is very minimal

    When we wrote this a few years ago, we estimated that the carbon footprint of all the world’s text messages to be 32,000 tons of CO2e per year. By now, it will have grown quite a bit, but 32,000 tons is still a tiny figure for all the world’s text messaging.

That’s the equivalent of the carbon footprint of around 1,700 US citizens, if we use the older figure of the average US citizen having a carbon footprint of 19 metric tons. Adding pictures increases the figure. And the world’s carbon footprint is 50 billion metric tons. So, a drop in the bucket.

What this does go to show is how insane the members of the Cult of Climastrology are, that they would even worry about whether their text messaging is Bad for global warming/climate change. They need to get a grip. Of course, this is what the constant drumbeat of future doom from tiny amounts of CO2 does to weak-minded and easily impressible Leftists creates.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove[6]. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach[7].
Endnotes:

    [Image]: http://rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/al-gore-750.jpg
    reports:: http://rightwingnews.com/climate-change/say-are-your-text-messages-bad-for-global-warming/
    How Much Do Your Text Messages Contribute To Global Warming?: http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/01/07/461381813/how-much-do-your-text-messages-contribute-to-global-warming
    Small World Consulting: http://www.sw-consulting.co.uk/
    his 2010 book: http://www.amazon.com/How-Bad-Are-Bananas-Everything/dp/1553658310
    Pirate’s Cove: http://www.thepiratescove.us/
    @WilliamTeach: http://twitter.com/WilliamTeach

[bob434]

"Very minimal doesn't mean anythign to the left-

"  “A friend asked how texting – in all its forms (admittedly a squishy thing to corral) – is contributing to global warming? After saying, ‘minimally…’, I thought about how to answer that question. "

The answer is simple- the amount is so small that it is ridiculous to even bring it up in discussion- the Amount of Atmosphere affected by man's CO2 amounts to just 0.00136%- that's it folks- that includes ALL the carbon belching business buildings, SUV's Cow Farts, Camel Farts- whatever- 0.00136% of our atmosphere is NOT the cause of global warming- so to even ask how texting affects the climate is ridiculous- it doesn't- period- it can't- because forst of all the total amount produced by man for Everything is far far far too small to affect climates- so the total amount produced by testing is going to be so insignificantly small by comparison that even asking the question is ridiculous

Here's a bonus fact ofr everyone- Temperatures always rise 800-1000 years BEFORE CO2 rises- proving CO2 is not causing climate change-

Bonus fact #2 Despite CO2 rising steadily for the past 20 years the climate temps have not risen- further proof that strengthens the fact that CO2 is not causing climate change-

[rangerrebew]

"Very minimal doesn't mean anythign to the left-

"  “A friend asked how texting – in all its forms (admittedly a squishy thing to corral) – is contributing to global warming? After saying, ‘minimally…’, I thought about how to answer that question. "

The answer is simple- the amount is so small that it is ridiculous to even bring it up in discussion- the Amount of Atmosphere affected by man's CO2 amounts to just 0.00136%- that's it folks- that includes ALL the carbon belching business buildings, SUV's Cow Farts, Camel Farts- whatever- 0.00136% of our atmosphere is NOT the cause of global warming- so to even ask how texting affects the climate is ridiculous- it doesn't- period- it can't- because forst of all the total amount produced by man for Everything is far far far too small to affect climates- so the total amount produced by testing is going to be so insignificantly small by comparison that even asking the question is ridiculous

Here's a bonus fact ofr everyone- Temperatures always rise 800-1000 years BEFORE CO2 rises- proving CO2 is not causing climate change-

Bonus fact #2 Despite CO2 rising steadily for the past 20 years the climate temps have not risen- further proof that strengthens the fact that CO2 is not causing climate change-

You seem to have excluded all the noxious gasses emanating from the District of Corruption.  I submit they alone could make the total rise to the level St. Algore fears.

[bob434]

lol- I purposely left that out because I don't like even mentioning the name 'liberal' ... ick- i said it-