Author Topic: Moody's Analytics: Clinton predicted to beat Trump...due to economics  (Read 508 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SirLinksALot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,417
  • Gender: Male
SOURCE: CNN

http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/26/news/economy/hillary-clinton-beat-donald-trump-moodys/index.html

by: Heather Long

____________________________________


Donald Trump is in trouble, according to a model that has correctly predicted the winner of every presidential race since Ronald Reagan in 1980.

This time around the model -- run by Moody's Analytics -- says a Democrat will win the White House. Hillary Clinton is widely expected to be the Democratic nominee.

It's a bad sign for Trump. Moody's has been predicting a Democratic triumph since last August, but the margin of victory is getting bigger for the left as the economy has stayed relatively strong and President Obama's approval rating has risen.

The reason a Democrat will win isn't about polling or personalities, it's about economics, says Moody's. The economy is the top issue in just about every election. When the economy is doing well, the party currently in office usually wins again. When the economy is tanking, Americans vote for change.

So far, the U.S. economy is chugging along. It's growing. Millions of people are getting jobs, home prices are rising and gas is cheap. All of this favors Democrats.

What Trump needs to win

So how can Trump win? Moody's says the only way that happens is if gas prices spike, President Obama's approval rating tanks or voters act very, very differently than they have since the 1980s.

"Gasoline prices would have to be somewhere in the $3 range for the Republicans to potentially win," says Dan White, a senior economist at Moody's Analytics. (The average price at the pump is currently a mere $2.31, according to AAA).

The next president could be Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders (or even another Democrat). Moody's doesn't analyze individual candidates. It only predicts which party will win the White House.
"We don't have a Trump variable in the model," admits White. "If voters don't react the way they have in the past, then the results of the model count be wrong."

The swing state economies look good

In addition to economics, the Moody's model also looks at how states have voted in the past and President Obama's approval rating. Obama's approval rating is now above 50% for the first time in three years. That helps Clinton.

"If it holds at current levels, the two-year increase in the president's approval rating running up to the election would surpass even that of President Ronald Reagan at the end of the Cold War," notes Moody's.

Furthermore, the economic situation on the ground is especially good in many of the swing states. Seven states are very close in the model: Virginia, New Hampshire, Ohio, Colorado, Florida, Nevada and North Carolina. Moody's predicts that all of them will go to the Democrat except North Carolina.

"Nevada has moved back into the democratic category very recently," says White. "A lot of that is because Nevada's economy is growing very well. It's one of top 10 states in country on income growth."

Trump seems to understand this dynamic. He talks often about how terrible he thinks the economy is. He says the "middle class is disappearing" and America's trade with China is "disastrous." He offers himself as the candidate of change, especially for business and the economy.

Offline Relic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,967
  • Gender: Male
Trust Americans, they are smart, they'll know Hillary is what we need.

Time to be ready for Hillary.

Offline austingirl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,734
  • Gender: Female
  • Cruz 2016- a Constitutional Conservative at last!
By what standard is the economy doing well? Growth is barely measurable and that is probably tweaked to make Zero look good.
Principles matter. Words matter.

Offline ScottinVA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,515
  • Gender: Male
The problem that Trump will face in November is not necessarily that the economy is doing well, it's that the PERCEPTION that it's doing well is a powerful one.  The "media" will be all-in with propagating that line.  Most Americans see only that 5% unemployment number and -- disinterested in peeling back the factual onion skin as they are -- don't bother equipping themselves with the understanding as to why that number is false on its face.  Most don't understand the meaning of 93 million long-term unemployed, nor will they grasp why the U6 unemployment read is far more valid than that of the U3.  That requires critical thinking... a skill severely lacking in today's society.

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,386
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
".....according to a model that has correctly predicted the winner of every presidential race since Ronald Reagan in 1980."

There are simply not enough data points in that short time, to make this "prediction" worth anything of note.

Did it or did it not predict Reagan x2 and then Bush I ?? The economy was good at the end with Clinton, but it predicted Bush II ?

Before responding to a seemingly "authoritative" and "scholarly" study, determine if it even meets realistic standards, or is merely a propaganda piece for Hillary's inevitability. 

There is no existing model with data to reflect the Trump phenomenon either. Like him or not he has blown right through predictions, ad infinitum.
"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln