Author Topic: Trump rages at veterans money reports  (Read 1264 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ExFreeper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 483
  • USAF 1975-87
Re: Trump rages at veterans money reports
« Reply #25 on: May 25, 2016, 12:44:19 am »
Not all vets are conservatives...some, are quite leftist in their thinking/actions...

The one has a #vetsvshate on his poster...they're an anti-islamophobia group...in other words, quislings.
Good catch.  Yep they were kicked out in Al at a trump carnival event.

"A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself." - Milton Friedman

Offline EtX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 169
  • Ready for Trump
Re: Trump rages at veterans money reports
« Reply #26 on: May 26, 2016, 02:46:09 am »
Should be easy to clear all this up by the end of the day. Surely, a couple of those "best and brightest" who Trump only associates with can compile receipts and disbursements in about 15 minutes?

Yes?

Cookin the books ain't hard to tRump's bean counters, but getting the Vet Groups to say they got the money when they didn't is another story.

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Re: Trump rages at veterans money reports
« Reply #27 on: May 26, 2016, 02:49:44 am »
Wait - you mean Trump still hasn't cleared this up?  WTH?

Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0
Re: Trump rages at veterans money reports
« Reply #28 on: May 26, 2016, 02:57:53 am »
Not all vets are conservatives...some, are quite leftist in their thinking/actions...

The one has a #vetsvshate on his poster...they're an anti-islamophobia group...in other words, quislings.

Yes.  There blood doesn't run red, and they should have no say in who our next emperor will be.  In fact there not really vets.  I prefer vets who don't protest the Rump.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2016, 03:00:17 am by Once-Ler »

Offline Mechanicos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,350
Re: Trump rages at veterans money reports
« Reply #29 on: May 26, 2016, 03:00:49 am »
Yes.  There blood doesn't run red, and they should have no say in who our next emperor will be.
When they are paid by Hillary dam right they get push back. And that's who that group was. You were suckerd by the liberals on this.
Trump is for America First.
"Crooked Hillary Clinton is the Secretary of the Status Quo – and wherever Hillary Clinton goes, corruption and scandal follow." D. Trump 7/11/16

Did you know that the word ‘gullible’ is not in the dictionary?

Isaiah 54:17

Offline SZonian

  • Strike without warning
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,715
  • 415th Nightstalker
Re: Trump rages at veterans money reports
« Reply #30 on: May 26, 2016, 03:05:55 am »
Yes.  There blood doesn't run red, and they should have no say in who our next emperor will be.  In fact there not really vets.  I prefer vets who don't protest the Rump.

Any veteran who's served honorably, whether lib or conservative has earned that right.

Doesn't mean I have to agree with them. 

Just pointing out that this group appears to be another in a long line of leftist sponsored groups designed to lend some semblance of credibility to their charges or accusations. 

Astro turf nonsense...
Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.

Online DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,397
Re: Trump rages at veterans money reports
« Reply #31 on: May 26, 2016, 08:06:16 am »
Really, Trump could produce Certified Public Records of the balance sheet and disbursements and #neverTrump would still attack him and call him a liar over it.

Actually, an honest forthright person would have done that from the get go and accounted for every dime and made it public leaving nothing for the imagination. It was what responsible people with integrity do when handling other peoples money. Yet you seem to think an accounting of his handling of other peoples money is not required. I don't understand that line of reasoning.