CNN Commentator Says Trump Complimenting A Woman Is Worse Than Bill Clinton Raping Several Women
http://downtrend.com/71superb/cnn-commentator-says-trump-complimenting-a-woman-is-worse-than-bill-clinton-raping-several-womenMay 17, 2016| by Brian Anderson
Being a liberal means being full of shit and being full of shit means you will eventually have to defend the indefensible. Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has put all of her liberal supporters in this position. Her marriage to serial rapist and philanderer Bill Clinton is causing all kinds of moral chaos for people backing the pro-woman candidate.
On CNN today, Clinton fan-girl and political commentator Angela Rye had to come to Bad Boy Billy’s defense in the worst possible way. She could have just admitted that Bill Clinton is horrible abuser of women and Hillary is a fraud for sticking with him, but that is not an option for the die-hard left. Instead, she actually tried to make a point that Donald Trump complimenting a woman was worse than Bill Clinton raping and sexually assault several women.
Rye was debating Trump supporter Dr. Gina Loudo over the media’s weak attempt to frame the GOP nominee as anti-women. They were specifically talking about a NY Times hit-piece in which the worst thing they could come up with was Trump once complimented a woman by saying she looked “stunning.”
After Rye tried to attack Trump for even sillier things like he believes his daughter is not ugly, Loudo hit back with this:
“I think what it reprehensible is you take someone like Hillary Clinton, who has basically danced on the assault of the women — dozens of women, by the way — that her husband has maligned and assaulted. I wish Hillary would come to the defense of these women,” said Loudo.
This set Rye off completely and she angrily shot back:
“You cannot continue to say that Hillary Clinton does not stand up for women who are sexual assault survivors and have been brutalized and victimized. You cannot continue to put the behavior of her husband on her and at her feet. You just can’t continue to do this,” yelled Rye.
And now for the money shot:
“We know that Donald Trump will continue to call her an ‘enabler’ and I am just dying to know what he would call his three wives based on his behavior?” Rye finished.
Okay, the NY Times has already established that the worst thing Donald Trump did was say a woman looked stunning, and as it turns out, that woman was not offended by the compliment in the way the liberal newspaper tried to spin it. On the other hand, Bill Clinton has settled two lawsuits with women he has raped or sexually assaulted. There are many more sexual assault accusations out there. He has admitted to numerous extramarital affairs. He has taken 26 flights on a private airplane used for underage sex parties and owned by a convicted child rapist.
Like I said, Angela Rye, with all of her liberal sensibilities, thinks that complimenting a woman is worse than raping one (or several). And she feels this way because Trump is the man doing the complimenting and Bill Clinton is the rapist.
Even the framework of her argument is stupid. Hillary Clinton has stuck by Bill’s side through all of the rapes, affairs, and abuse of women. That’s why she is an enabler. Trump has been married 3 times so that means that, for whatever reason, 2 of his wives didn’t stick with him. Even if there were evidence of Trump abusing women, his 3 wives wouldn’t be called enablers because 2 of them divorced him.
Lastly, Rye claims that Hillary has stood up for rape victims, but it is a fact that she never stood up for the women her husband victimized. Can you really be a defender of women and champion of sexual assault victims when you don’t care if your husband is raping and groping women? I guess so if you are liberal and completely full of shit.
