Author Topic: Target Management Tells Boycott Group to Expect No Change to Transgender Bathroom Policy  (Read 1866 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,828
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
A month after launching an effort to boycott retail giant Target over its decision to allow transgender men to use women’s bathrooms and changing rooms in the retailer’s stores, theAmerican Family Association (AFA) met with the chain’s management but were warned not to expect changes in the policy.

Representatives of the AFA met with Target’s management to hand deliver a petition with over 1.2 million signers urging the retailer to abandon the pro-transgender bathroom policy announced early in March.

Only days after the LGBT-driven agenda was announced, the AFA started an online petition urging followers to boycott the chain because the policy opens customers to danger from sexual predators who would hide behind the ill-conceived policy in order to gain easy access to unsuspecting victims. The petition reached one million signers in less than a week.

Finally, on May 11, Tim Wildmon, President of American Family Association and American Family Radio, met with Target management about the petition. Wildmon said in a statement:

Read more: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/05/14/target-management-tells-boycott-group-no-change-transgender-bathroom-policy/
The Republic is lost.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
Target's policy is the same policy that was in effect BEFORE all this NC nonsense started.

Transgenders have been going to the restrooms of their choice for, well, forever.  Target is simply stating that that policy will continue.

What in the hell is the big deal?
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline SirLinksALot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,417
  • Gender: Male
SOURCE: BUSINESS INSIDER

URL: http://www.businessinsider.com/target-boycott-impact-on-sales-2016-5

BY:    Hayley Peterson

Target is facing a nationwide backlash for its support of transgender rights.

More than 1.2 million people have signed a pledge to boycott the retailer after it announced last month that it would welcome transgender customers to use any bathroom or fitting room that matches their gender identity.

Critics have been holding protests and demonstrations at stores across the country, and they are showing no signs of dying down.

Many are demanding access to bathrooms of the opposite sex to support claims that "perverts" can now prey on children and women as a result of the policy.

The boycotters' goal is to force Target to reverse its policy, or at least make the retailer suffer for it by spending their money elsewhere.

But Target CEO Brian Cornell dug in his heels on the issue this week, saying Target won't reverse its stance.

"We took a stance and we are going to continue to embrace our belief of diversity and inclusion," Cornell said on CNBC.

So what does that mean for Target's business?
Sales may drop for at least short period, according to YouGov BrandIndex, a firm that measures consumer perceptions of major brands on a daily basis.

Before the boycott, 42% of consumers considered buying from Target the next time they shop at a department store. In the last couple weeks, that share has fallen to 36%, according to YouGov data provided to Business Insider.

Consumer perception of the brand has also dropped sharply. It's at its lowest point in two years.

Despite the drop, Target is still in "positive" perception territory. In other words, there are still more people who think positively about Target than negatively.

"There's a very large group out there that supports Target's decision," says crisis management expert Kevin Dinino, CEO of San Diego-based KCD PR.

He pointed out that nearly 80 million people shop at Target's stores every month, so "at worst, we are talking about a group of 1.2 million shoppers — or 1.5% of Target's customers — who are disenfranchised."

Investors also don't seem too concerned about a long-term sales impact.

Target's share price has lost 9% of its value in the last month, but it's up 3% so far this year.

In the past, even the most widespread calls for company boycotts have tended to blow over within a matter of weeks to months.

Chick-fil-A, for example, faced a nationwide boycott in 2012 after Dan Cathy, the son of the late Chick-fil-A founder S. Truett Cathy, set off a fury among gay rights supporters when he told the Baptist Press in 2012 that the company was "guilty as charged" for backing "the biblical definition of a family." Following Cathy's remarks, reports emerged detailing Chick-fil-A's many charitable donations to anti-gay marriage organizations.

Despite the backlash, Chick-fil-A's sales soared 14% in 2012.

Ultimately, access to goods will outweigh moral outrage for many consumers, says Larry Chiagouris, a professor of marketing at Pace University’s Lubin School of Business in New York.

"The boycott is not going to last very long," Chiagouris told Business Insider. "There is a big difference between signing a petition compared to not taking advantage of a big sale at target. People will always take advantage of the sale."


Offline TomSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,432
  • Gender: Male
  • All deserve a trial if accused
Target management may have underestimated how people disagree with this asinine policy. I would not get anything there. Jackasses.

Wingnut

  • Guest
To liken the Chic-Fal-A boycott to the Target boycott is a disingenuous apples and oranges comparison.  CFA was on the right side of the issue and people rewarded the company with their support.  Tar jay is on the wrong side of the issue and hopefully they will pay for it with lost sales.  It may blow over like the "expert" predicts.  But I hope not.


A-Lert

  • Guest
Target won't reverse its stance

We'll see what the stockholders say when sales tank.

Offline bob434

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 324
sadly- Dear Leader has probably told them not to back down and that the gubmint iwll cover all their l osses

Offline bob434

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 324
he's tryign to equate men using bathrooms ILLEGALLY and in the shadows, hoping not to get caught and arrested, with all perverts that are males now being using women's bathrooms without fear of being arrested for doing so- it is a disingenuous liberal position- one that claims 'there have never been any incidents before this- so what's the big deal' DESPITE the fact that there have been tons of incidents/crimes/rapes/ physical abuses etc- Liberals know damn well that INCREASING the nubmers of perverted men/criminals in women's bathrooms, by legally allowing them in there- will obviously increase then umber of attacks- but they don't give a damn apparently and are only interested in making conservatives and people of moral values out to be the bad guys for 'opposing poor confused innocent trannies' who 'just want ot feel comfortable- is that so bad?"

YES it is bad- they are not innocent- not by a long shot- and i have posted several times a video showing many crimes by violent trannies occurring in women's bathrooms DESPITE it being illegal for men to use them now- and this will only get much much worse AFTER the gubmint demands that all women's bathrooms allow men to use them- liberals are trotting out the tired out ignorant 'You're just fear mongering- there's no real evidence that any crimes have been committed by trannies' crap to try to shame conservatives into silence- but it's not going to work because their claim is a blatant lie! Many Trannies are sick individuals who were sexually abused as children, and who themselves become abusers- and they ARE attacking women and children in women's bathrooms already- despite it being against the l aw for them to even be in there- Inviting more sick individuals, and opening the door to male rapists, pedophiles etc is NOT the way to solve the issue- and the liberals know this full well- but they would rather be damned than to stop trying to force this sickness on us!
« Last Edit: May 15, 2016, 07:25:11 am by bob434 »

Offline ConstitutionRose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,474
  • Gender: Female
To liken the Chic-Fal-A boycott to the Target boycott is a disingenuous apples and oranges comparison.  CFA was on the right side of the issue and people rewarded the company with their support.  Tar jay is on the wrong side of the issue and hopefully they will pay for it with lost sales.  It may blow over like the "expert" predicts.  But I hope not.

I had to go elsewhere and settle for a product I consider 2nd best, but I'm not buying anything from Target.
"Old man can't is dead.  I helped bury him."  Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas quoting his grandfather.

Offline Nextrush

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7
If people are determined enough the boycott will be meaningful and long lasting.

This kind of boycott doesn't demand as much as the bus boycott in Montgomery Alabama did back in the mid 1950's when people had to 'hoof it' to travel around town or ride in private cars if they were available in order to send a message about the racial policies of the government.

There are plenty of other options to Target for those who seriously want to boycott.

The 'bathroom issue' has great emotional impact, but of greater concern to me is corporate America's hostility to the First Amendment applying to churches and religious groups that oppose gay marriage.

Governor Deal in Georgia vetoed protection narrowly defined to apply to religious groups under big business pressure back in March.

If that stands this country is on par with  a totalitarian state where religion is suppressed to the whims of the government.

geronl

  • Guest
Target has been forced to oust a CEO and change over-gay ad policy because of boycott threats before

geronl

  • Guest
Target's policy is the same policy that was in effect BEFORE all this NC nonsense started.

Transgenders have been going to the restrooms of their choice for, well, forever.  Target is simply stating that that policy will continue.

What in the hell is the big deal?

Now you can watch a grown man with a full beard follow a 7-year old girl into a restroom and know that you aren't supposed to be concerned. If she turns up beaten and raped, oh well, that is the price of tolerance.

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,403
Now you can watch a grown man with a full beard follow a 7-year old girl into a restroom and know that you aren't supposed to be concerned. If she turns up beaten and raped, oh well, that is the price of tolerance.
I'm also picturing a guy putting on some lipstick, donning a wig and going into the ladies' room to lie in wait for some elderly lady who can't fight back when he knocks her down and steals her purse. There was a time when a store employee seeing a man enter the ladies' room would immediately know something was wrong. Now, they'll be afraid of offending some poor transgendered soul who's just trying to express himself. Er, I mean herself. Or the herself he - rats! she - wants to be.
Support Israel's emergency medical service. afmda.org

geronl

  • Guest
I'm also picturing a guy putting on some lipstick, donning a wig and going into the ladies' room to lie in wait for some elderly lady who can't fight back when he knocks her down and steals her purse. There was a time when a store employee seeing a man enter the ladies' room would immediately know something was wrong. Now, they'll be afraid of offending some poor transgendered soul who's just trying to express himself. Er, I mean herself. Or the herself he - rats! she - wants to be.

If a gang of males follows a girl in and leaves someone to guard the door, that shouldn't be suspicious to us at all, right.... lol

Offline bob434

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 324
Now you can watch a grown man with a full beard follow a 7-year old girl into a restroom and know that you aren't supposed to be concerned. If she turns up beaten and raped, oh well, that is the price of tolerance.

When the girl gets beat up- molested, raped or even murdered- the msm will scream day and night about how it was just a 'lone wolf' and how the incident 'doesn't represent the majority of good decent transgender people'- and the msm will keep doing htis as the cases pile up one after another- just like every time there is a terrorist islamic attack in europe, or the US - even when htye are caught with terrorist propaganda and connections, the msm will never admit they are terrorosts and insist they are 'lone wolves'- and our own president is quick to jump on 'whitey' whenever a police officer is forced to shoot someone who isn't white in the lien of duty, but he's also the first to jump in and declare' we shouldn't jump to conclusions' when a man runs through a restaurant or business, or whatever- full of westerners, and shouts the terrorist war cry as he's gunning down victims- So tied of all these terrorist apologists, and all the pervert apologists telling us it's Our fault that those people are the way they are- or telling us it's us that is the problem and not them!