Not if one actually studies Trump's past, focusing on the facts, and ignores the self-serving "truthful hyperbole" rhetoric Trump has been serving up. The only thing to count on is a GOP-controlled Congress to put some measure of limitation on the continuing depredations of the next liberal president, be that Trump or Clinton.
Studying his past is fine, and Trump supporters are fully cognizant of his earlier views on a whole range of topics, but people grow and change. More importantly, they are politically bound by the mandate on which they campaign. Yes, they can stray on some issues and have a bit of a parameter on others...but they have little choice, in practical terms, but to govern within their party's general platform. Failing to do so would simply mean no legislation, no judges...no anything for the most part. So while you may mistrust him from his past, it is equally true that he is politically bound to the GOP moving forward. He cannot, and is not dumb enough to try, govern or serve as President without party support. And that defines what he can and more importantly, cannot do as President. Ditto for Mrs. Clinton.
So count on what you will...but Trump will work with a GOP congress and Hillary, by nature of her party affiliation will work entirely at odds with the GOP. Worse yet, should she have a Dem congress...she will work within THAT platform and every liberal wet dream of an agenda will fast track into all of our lives. In short, there is no reasonable argument that can make the prospective governance of these two persons the same...if nothing else, their political ties force differences whether they are heart-held or simply expedient positions.
Reason and common sense lead to the obvious conclusion that a Trump presidency would be vastly more conservative than would a Clintonian one...and on some level that has nothing to do with the personal views of either candidate.