Author Topic: 3 Significant Instances Where Transparency Advocates Haven’t Been Able to Get Info About Obama SCOTUS Nominee Merrick Garland  (Read 286 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,831
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Merrick Garland, has been busy meeting privately with senators in recent weeks. But a watchdog group is pushing for the release of more documents about Garland’s background.

Senate Republicans are blocking Garland’s nomination, and a confirmation seems unlikely. Republicans contend that the voters in the 2016 election should decide who fills the vacancy that could mean a new 5-4 split that has the potential to tilt the Supreme Court for a generation.

President Barack Obama nominates Judge Merrick Garland, right, to the U.S. Supreme Court, in the Rose Garden at the White House March 16. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Here are three instances where government watchdogs and journalists have sought more information about Garland’s background...

More at:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/05/02/3-significant-instances-where-transparency-advocates-havent-been-able-to-get-info-about-obama-scotus-nominee-merrick-garland/
« Last Edit: May 03, 2016, 05:28:36 am by Free Vulcan »
The Republic is lost.

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
I am a little surprised that Brennan's files are sealed. Why exactly does a SC Justice need his stuff hidden from the public for 20 years?