The Senate disrespects military leaders
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-senate-disrespects-military-leaders/2016/04/29/368124e2-0cc0-11e6-bc53-db634ca94a2a_story.htmlNavy Adm. William H. McRaven in Washington in 2013. (Evan Vucci/Associated Press)
April 29
I support retired Admiral William H. McRaven’s contention that our civilian-military relationships have served this nation well in our 240 years of democracy and through multiple conflicts in which our civilian leaders directed that our military fight and die for our freedom and for our land [“Commander of bin Laden raid blasts Senate for disrespect of military leaders,” news, April 26]. I also support his pointed disappointment in and discomfort with civilian leadership that attempts to manipulate and demean decades-long career accomplishments in favor of people who may have served only months.
In my 33 years of naval experience, I have seen an amazing array of leaders; some lead by size and presentation, some by their ability to persuade, some by their ability to make distress and hardship into humor, some by their ability to empathize. Yet they were all leaders. Not everyone relates to every leader. Not every leader is perfect. Perfect doesn’t exist. Congress apparently is trying to create a leadership-driven service that is perfect. In doing so, it is creating a service that is becoming leaderless. It is trying to perfect a service by finding faults instead of reinforcing good service, leadership and honor.
We’re sending the wrong people to boot camp!