Author Topic: RNC punts on rule changes  (Read 454 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 384,560
  • Let's Go Brandon!
RNC punts on rule changes
« on: April 21, 2016, 07:26:40 pm »
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/277156-rnc-punts-on-rule-changes

April 21, 2016, 03:02 pm
RNC punts on rule changes

By Ben Kamisar

HOLLYWOOD, FLA. — The Republican National Committee's rules committee chose to punt on changing rules for how a presidential nominee is chosen in a contested convention.
 
In avoiding a high-profile battle to simplify the rules, the committee rallied behind chairman Reince Priebus's repeated insistence that no changes should be made before the July convention.
 
The committee adjourned just one hour after it began without making any changes, including one that could have made it more difficult for party leaders to nominate a "white knight" candidate -- someone not currently in the race  who could take on Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.
 
Committee members repeatedly warned against provoking the ire of the voters by suggesting rules changes just months before Republicans meet for the convention in Cleveland.
 
"We are basically in the seventh inning of the ball game and its not right to change the rules of the ball game in the middle," Georgia committeeman and rules committee member Randy Evans said.
 
"This is a very hotly contested election and any change that we make will be viewed with a large degree of cynicism.”
 
The RNC's standing committee doesn't have the final say on the convention rules -- that's left to the delegates elected to the convention rules committee. But the standing committee can make temporary changes to the rules that would need to be agreed on by the convention delegates.
 
The lion's share of the debate centered on a bid by a longtime Oregon committeeman Solomon Yue. He wanted to change the rulebook to provide what he believes would be more transparency while also clamping down on the ability of party leaders to insert an establishment alternative into the race.
 
But after about 45 minutes of debate, the vast majority of the hall voted against the bid and quashed it.
 
Earlier in the meeting, the committee withdrew two other potential rule changes.
 
One of those measures would have eliminated the "carve-out" allowing four states — Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada — to hold a primary or caucus before March 1 without penalty.
 
The other measure would have been a minor procedural change to how the RNC chairman and co-chairman are elected.
 
Enid Mickelsen, the Utah committeewoman who proposed the rules change at a previous meeting, told the committee she wanted to withdraw her resolution for another day.
 
"This is a discussion that we need to have again someday, but I would submit that this is not that day," she said in the opening minutes of the meeting.
 
"I will submit, Mr. Chairman, that in the supercharged political environment in which we find ourselves, this is not the time to be debating rules changes."
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline AnybodyButaDem

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 684
Re: RNC punts on rule changes
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2016, 07:32:41 pm »
The plan is to Dump Trump in a contested convention, and Lose With Cruz to Hillary in the fall so they can rub it in the faces of the conservatives they obviously loathe.
Guess who got the NYT's endorsement in the GOP primary?

Offline ArneFufkin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,579
Re: RNC punts on rule changes
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2016, 07:33:47 pm »
The plan is to Dump Trump in a contested convention, and Lose With Cruz to Hillary in the fall so they can rub it in the faces of the conservatives they obviously loathe.

Do any of you Trump supporters ever make an authentic statement?

Offline AnybodyButaDem

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 684
Re: RNC punts on rule changes
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2016, 08:02:39 pm »
Do any of you Trump supporters ever make an authentic statement?

You think the GOPe wants Ted Cruz or Trump in the White House?  That's cute.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2016, 08:03:08 pm by AnybodyButaDem »
Guess who got the NYT's endorsement in the GOP primary?

Offline ArneFufkin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,579
Re: RNC punts on rule changes
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2016, 09:42:00 pm »
You think the GOPe wants Ted Cruz or Trump in the White House?  That's cute.

So, your contention is that this shadowy "GOPe" bogey-man cabal you Trumpbots have invented to validate your fecklessness is going to run the most Conservative member of the United States Congress as their Presidential nominee in order to "rub it in the faces of conservatives they obviously loathe?"   

"Here, let's game the system to nominate a candidate who is the most demonstrably conservative stalwart in politics to represent our Party in a Presidential election.  That'll show those Conservatives how much we hate them."

The absurd ignorance of this buffoon, the lazy vulgarity of his campaign and the absolutely devoid critical thinking capacity of his slavish acolytes is mind-boggling.   Trump and his followers constitute a 24 X 7 insult to the intelligence of humanity.   
« Last Edit: April 21, 2016, 09:46:15 pm by ArneFufkin »

Offline AnybodyButaDem

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 684
Re: RNC punts on rule changes
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2016, 09:47:27 pm »
So, your contention is that this shadowy "GOPe" bogey-man cabal you Trumpbots have invented to validate your fecklessness is going to run the most Conservative member of the United States Congress as their Presidential nominee in order to "rub it in the faces" of ...  "conservatives they obviously loathe?"   

"Here, let's game the system to nominate a candidate who is the most demonstrably conservative stalwart in politics to represent our Party in a Presidential election.  That'll show those Conservatives how much we hate them."

The absurd ignorance of this buffoon, the lazy vulgarity of his campaign and the absolutely devoid critical thinking capacity of his slavish acolytes is mind-boggling.   Trump and his followers constitute a 24 X 7 insult to the intelligence of humanity.   

First of all, lazy campaign?  The guy is speaking to thousands of supporters a day.

Second, I'm sure it makes you feel better thinking all of us Trump supporters are brain-dead morons, but that's not the case.  Voters can't stand Ted Cruz, he'll play even worse in a general election, then the GOPe/Dem Uniparty gets to keep control of things with the added bonus of saying "see, a conservative politician can't win."

Frankly, I'm surprised Cruz hasn't figured this out yet, but from what I see of his supporters here, the ugliness and fantastical delusions of Cruz winning the presidency, maybe I shouldn't be.
Guess who got the NYT's endorsement in the GOP primary?