Trump campaign manager will not be prosecuted, sources say

[alicewonders]

Alice is spamming the non Trump Caucus area of  BR board again.

What do you mean by that?

[sinkspur]

I actually see Fields grab Trump's arm first in the video.  Should she be charged with battery, too?

Also, she says she "almost fell down" and was "yanked."  You're throwing your lot in with a disturbed moonbat.

Do you think Fields other false claims would be brought up in discovery, too?

Lewandowski would be the target of a defamation case.  If Trump's consigliere wants to file suit against Fields, he can.  I doubt he will though.

Let Trump file a charge against Fields for "touching" him.  Would be just the thing he needs in an election where 75% of women hate him.

[Wingnut]

What do you mean by that?

What do you mean by asking me what do you mean by that?

[AnybodyButaDem]

What do you mean by that?

I was wondering the same thing.  This thread is newsworthy.  Much more than Trump saying something about Joe Paterno is newsworthy.

Does he mean this?  If you're a woman (not sure if you are but your name would suggest so), apparently you're supposed to go back to the Trump kitchen and not show your face in whatever the "non Trump forum" is?

Funny thing is I read today this Wingnut chap is 40 years old.  It boggles the mind.

[Right_in_Virginia]

What do you mean by that?

Great question, Alice.  I'll be checking back for the answer. 

[A-Lert]

Fields NEVER said she was knocked to the ground. 

I'd BEG Lewandowski to sue Fields for defamation so a thorough Discovery could take place into his past indiscretions.

She said she was pulled down. Plainly a lie. The DA saw the video and refused to pursue the charges.

[alicewonders]

I was wondering the same thing.  This thread is newsworthy.  Much more than Trump saying something about Joe Paterno is newsworthy.

Does he mean this?  If you're a woman (not sure if you are but your name would suggest so), apparently you're supposed to go back to the Trump kitchen and not show your face in whatever the "non Trump forum" is?

Funny thing is I read today this Wingnut chap is 40 years old.  It boggles the mind.

Yes, I still have posting privileges on the whole forum.  I posted this here so everyone could talk about it.  I'm damned if I do, and I'm damned if I don't.   

It's not spam, it's news.

 

[Wingnut]

Great question, Alice.  I'll be checking back for the answer.

Reply deleted by Alice aka Mod2. 

[sinkspur]

Comment deleted by Mod2

Not cool.  Comment deleted by Mod2

Take it from someone who's been non-discrete, your post is out of line.

[Wingnut]

Comments deleted by Alice aka Mod2.

[A-Lert]

Yes, I still have posting privileges on the whole forum.  I posted this here so everyone could talk about it.  I'm damned if I do, and I'm damned if I don't.   

It's not spam, it's news.

 

It is news that most of us who saw the video vs. Ms. Fields claims knew was coming. The anti-Trumps are just showing their displeasure that the DA saw the claims Ms. Fields made were indeed false.

[alicewonders]

It is news that most of us who saw the video vs. Ms. Fields claims knew was coming. The anti-Trumps are just showing their displeasure that the DA saw the claims Ms. Fields made were indeed false.

Yes, anyone who read more than the headlines and watched the videos with their own eyes knew this was coming.  Dirty politics at it's finest - smear someone right before an election and then it gets "corrected" after the election is over.

And there are those here that cheer that kind of corrupt and sleazy trick. 

[jmyrlefuller]

Yes, I still have posting privileges on the whole forum.  I posted this here so everyone could talk about it.  I'm damned if I do, and I'm damned if I don't.   

It's not spam, it's news.

 

I don't object to it being here. For one, some topics need the perspective of both sides, and this was one of them.

[sinkspur]

Yes, anyone who read more than the headlines and watched the videos with their own eyes knew this was coming.  Dirty politics at it's finest - smear someone right before an election and then it gets "corrected" after the election is over.

And there are those here that cheer that kind of corrupt and sleazy trick. 

Don't whine. Trump whines enough for all of you. Whining is so baby.

[A-Lert]

Whining is so baby.

Then please cease and desist.

[AnybodyButaDem]

It is news that most of us who saw the video vs. Ms. Fields claims knew was coming. The anti-Trumps are just showing their displeasure that the DA saw the claims Ms. Fields made were indeed false.

It's very liberal-like, isn't it?  There is actual proof that Fields was lying and slandering the Trump guy, yet like liberals do, they ignore reality and instead keep insisting that the phony narrative they have created in their mind is indeed factual.

It's like Hands Up Don't Shoot on a lower level of social impact.

[AnybodyButaDem]

Don't whine. Trump whines enough for all of you. Whining is so baby.

Why didn't you admonish this Wingnut chap who whined about alicewonders "spamming" the board by posting one thread?  Is it because he posts vulgar things about Trump and Trump supporters?