Author Topic: Sotomayor Hits SCOTUS Lack of Diversity After Obama Nominates White Male  (Read 757 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 395,713
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://www.newsmax.com/PrintTemplate.aspx/?nodeid=723045


Newsmax
Sotomayor Hits SCOTUS Lack of Diversity After Obama Nominates White Male
Saturday, April 9, 2016 11:20 AM

By: By JENNIFER PELTZ

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the nation's highest court needs more diversity of personal backgrounds and professional experience, speaking as a vacancy has refocused attention on the court's makeup.

During a talk Friday at Brooklyn Law School, Sotomayor didn't mention the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland, who is highly respected but wouldn't add racial, religious, or educational diversity to the high court. But Sotomayor, the court's first Latina justice, said "it is important that we have greater diversity on the Supreme Court" and in the legal profession.

"I, for one, do think there is a disadvantage from having (five) Catholics, three Jews, everyone from an Ivy League school," several justices from New York City and no one who practiced criminal defense law outside white-collar settings, Sotomayor told the law school audience.

Sotomayor and some of her colleagues have said before that the high court could benefit from more diversity, but her remarks Friday come in the fraught context of a nomination in unusual limbo.

Since conservative Justice Antonin Scalia's January death left Democratic President Barack Obama with the chance to fill a seat that could shift the court's ideological balance, Senate Republicans have said they will not consider confirming anyone named before the November presidential election.

Some liberal groups hoped Obama, who had previously tapped Sotomayor and Justice Elena Kagan, would nominate another woman or minority. Instead, he tapped Merrick Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Garland, 63, is a white, Jewish former prosecutor with an Ivy League background and a career in the capital — and a centrist reputation the White House may have hoped would put pressure on Republicans to consider him.

Sotomayor didn't mention Garland or touch on the nomination. But in answer to diversity-related questions submitted by Brooklyn Law students, she said she felt that varied backgrounds help justices "educate each other to be better listeners and better thinkers because we understand things from experience."

She recounted a 2009 oral argument in which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg suggested that her then all-male colleagues had wrongly equated a strip-search of a middle-school girl to changing for gym class in a locker room because they had "never been a 13-year-old girl." The court ultimately ruled, 8-1, that the search was unconstitutional.

Sotomayor stressed that decisions depend on the law, not personal viewpoints or experiences.

"But a different perspective can permit you to more fully understand the arguments that are before you and help you articulate your position in a way that everyone will understand," she said.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,912
  • Gender: Male
If Liberals are noticeably untroubled about their automatic assumptions as regards group membership and impartiality, it is because they value one far more than the other.
"The most terrifying force of death, comes from the hands of Men who wanted to be left Alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over. -Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 83,505
Quote
Some liberal groups hoped Obama, who had previously tapped Sotomayor and Justice Elena Kagan, would nominate another woman or minority.
Remember that "quota" language in the U.S. Constitution that the founding fathers fought so hard to include? Me neither.

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,871
This is why winning the next Presidency is so important, folks.

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,639
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Sotomeyer is a racist, pure and simple. If you're white, you should be excluded from society, or at least accept your place under the boot and the whip. She like other leftist minorities are all about 'perspective' that somehow your sex, race, ethnicity, financial status, and other subjective factors should dominate how you approach the law, rather than the objective.

Example:

Quote
Sotomayor stressed that decisions depend on the law, not personal viewpoints or experiences.

"But a different perspective can permit you to more fully understand the arguments that are before you and help you articulate your position in a way that everyone will understand," she said.

And of course the 'wise Latina' just understands things a little bit better than the rest of us.
« Last Edit: April 11, 2016, 06:55:38 pm by Free Vulcan »
The Republic is lost.

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,881
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
In the view of Sonia Sotomayor, the Supreme Court won't represent "diversity" until there are no white males at all sitting there -- and perhaps no white females, either.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Would a teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle make her happy?  That would be REAL diversity. :tongue2:

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 83,505
Has she noticed there are no Protestants on the Court? Not very diverse, indeed!