Belgian Soldiers Deployed to Fight Terrorists Had No Bullets in Rifles

[rangerrebew]

Belgian Soldiers Deployed to Fight Terrorists Had No Bullets in Rifles

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/262303/belgian-soldiers-deployed-fight-terrorists-had-no-daniel-greenfield

March 27, 2016
Daniel Greenfield
 

Much of counterterrorism is really security theater. TSA searches that have yet to stop a terrorist. Bombing raids that don't drop bombs. Soldiers standing with rifles that have no bullets in them. It looks impressive. But there's no substance behind it.

    Rabbi Menachem Hadad of Brussels’ Shomre Hadas haredi Orthodox community said that soldiers who were posted outside a synagogue and the city’s Chabad House following the slaying of four Jews in Brussels’ Jewish Museum of Belgium in 2014 told him that for months, they used to guard the area with no bullets in their rifles. “It was just a show."

Of course it's just for show. Anything else would be too much. Western governments don't want to actually stop Islamic terrorism. They want to look like they're trying.

It's not just Obama. It's the whole system.

After every terror attack, there's security theater. Empty reassurances that the guys running everything are really taking it seriously. But there's no there, there. Instead they'll keep on bringing huge numbers of Muslims, creating the next wave of terror, even while they put on a show of being serious about the latest attack.

Being serious about Islamic terrorism means ending Muslim migration. Any government that doesn't want to do that is also not going to do much to fight Islamic terrorism except go through the motions.

[rangerrebew]

You don't suppose, do you, the terrorists were aware of this?

[GourmetDan]

Of course it's just for show. Anything else would be too much. Western governments don't want to actually stop Islamic terrorism. They want to look like they're trying.

It's not just Obama. It's the whole system.

Exactly... it is the globalists who set the tone for all of the Western governments... and that tone is to surrender their national identity...

A one-world government is much easier to implement when nationalism has been destroyed...

[Fishrrman]

Mr. Greenfield (who I greatly respect) writes:
"Being serious about islamic terrorism means ending muslim migration. Any government that doesn't want to do that is also not going to do much to fight islamic terrorism except go through the motions."

He's right, of course, but I think that even Daniel Greenfield -- one of the most prominent voices of The West against islam -- is "holding back" here.

I daresay that Mr. Greenfield knows that simply ending "muslim migration" is NOT going to be "enough" at this point in time. There are too many here already, and they propagate quite prodigiously.

Nope. Not only must muslim migration to The West end, but we must begin to return those muslims already here back to dar al-islam. That includes "citizen muslims". Their citizenship must be forfeited unless they are willing to make a public, recorded, irrevocable renunciation of islam and convert to Christianity.

I sense Mr. Greenfield cannot say this -- at least not yet -- because he himself is a Jew, and of course is restrained by the specter of the Holocaust.

But even though he can't speak it, he senses it.

I am not afraid to speak it.

For we of The West, it's eventually going to be either this:


Or this: