Exclusive — ‘Disturbing Pattern’ of ‘Untruthfulness’: Team Kasich Says Ted Cruz Lying About New York Ballot

[HAPPY2BME]

by Matthew Boyle22 Mar 2016 Washington, DC

The presidential campaign for Ohio Gov. John Kasich is crying foul over reports that rival candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said in a private Manhattan meeting that Kasich didn’t make the ballot in New York state.

Kasich spokesman Rob Nichols told Breitbart News exclusively on Tuesday night after reports surfaced that Cruz falsely said Kasich wouldn’t be on the ballot in the Empire State:

Look, we all saw what Ted Cruz’s people did to Dr. Carson in Iowa. And we also saw what they tried to say about us in Illinois suggesting we wouldn’t be on the Illinois ballot when we were in fact on the Illinois ballot. And now we’re seeing him and his people say that we’re not going to be on the ballot in New York when I am currently looking at a picture of the ballot in New York with John Kasich’s name on it. This is a disturbing pattern, we think this race should be above that and our campaign will never drop to this level of untruthfulness.

Nichols’ comments come in response to a report from The Daily Caller’s Kerry Picket that Cruz reportedly told a closed-door meeting of New York Republicans in Manhattan on Tuesday that Kasich may not make the ballot in the state.

“Attendee at Ted Cruz event said Cruz told them Kasich may not make NY ballot,” Picket Tweeted with a link to her article, which has since been updated to reflect that that it is untrue to say that Kasich won’t make the ballot in New York.

Attendee at Ted Cruz event said Cruz told them Kasich may not make NY ballot https://t.co/fGEzi7HQMH

— Kerry Picket (@KerryPicket) March 22, 2016

The claim was also highlighted by the Texas Tribune’s dedicated Ted Cruz reporter Patrick Svitek, who Tweeted about it.

Cruz’s closed press meeting with about 100 people, according to Picket, was at the Metropolitan Republican Club on Manhattan’s Upper East Side.

“Cruz told the New York Republican group that it is a ‘two man race’ and that ‘nominating Trump is surrendering the election to Hillary Clinton,’” Picket wrote.

“Cruz also called Ohio Governor John Kasich a ‘spoiler,’ one attendee told The Daily Caller, and noted to attendees that Kasich may not make the ballot in New York,” Picket wrote. “At least five GOP County Chairs were in attendance, including Westchester County Chair Rob Astorino, New York State GOP Chairman Ed Cox, and Manhattan County GOP Chairwoman Adele Malpass.”

Cruz campaign national spokeswoman Alice Stewart told Breitbart News on Wednesday morning that Cruz didn’t say that.

“Ted said Gov. Kasich may drop out before NY, after losing badly in AZ, UT, and WI,” Stewart said in an email.

It’s unclear at this time whether Stewart has asked Picket and Svitek to retract their reporting on this.

Sam Nunberg—a New York Republican who previously advised Donald Trump’s campaign and is now unaffiliated but attended the Cruz meeting in Manhattan—told Breitbart News that Cruz didn’t say what Picket reported he said, or at least not in that context.

Nunberg said in a brief phone interview on Tuesday:

I attended the meeting. Sen. Cruz said that by the time the primary reaches New York, Kasich will have been out of the race because he is going to lose Arizona, he is going to lose Utah, and he is going to lose Wisconsin. He will have no rationale to be in the race and therefore should not be in the primary any longer. He never said in that room that Kasich was not on the ballot. Perhaps they should worry about winning another state besides Ohio.

“It came in the context of that by New York it should be a two-man race,” Nunberg added.

Picket has since updated her article to remove the claim she reported. “This post has been updated to reflect that John Kasich will appear on the NY Republican primary ballot,” her update reads.

Kasich’s team provided Breitbart News with evidence that proves the claim Cruz is reported to have made is entirely untrue.

First and foremost, a copy of the ballot on the New York State Board of Elections website shows Kasich’s name right there on the ballot. Secondly, a candidate petition list published there shows Kasich as a valid candidate.

In addition, Kasich’s team provided Breitbart News with a Feb. 23, 2016 email from Anthony Casale—a senior adviser to the state GOP committee in New York—proving that he was put on the ballot that day.

“To close the loop, our Commissioners on the State Board of Elections today voted to place Governor Kasich on the April 19 ballot,” Casale wrote in the Feb. 23 email.

But Kasich remaining in the race represents a serious problem for Cruz. Cruz claimed Tuesday evening that if Kasich had dropped out, he would have beat Trump in Illinois.

New York’s GOP primary is on April 19. The only primary between now and then is Wisconsin’s, which comes on April 5. This means Cruz, Trump and Kasich are likely to put a huge focus on both the Badger State and the Empire State next, now that Arizona and Utah are in the bag.

Current polling in New York state has Trump way ahead, up at 65 percent, according to Boston’s Emerson College Polling Center, while Cruz is down at just 12 percent and Kasich is down at 0ne percent. New York offers a rich 95 delegates proportionally by congressional district, but an extraordinarily strong showing by Trump in his home state could lead to him winning all or a significant portion of them.

This kind of a storyline on Cruz–in which he and his campaign appear to be engaged in dirty tricks again–coming out at this time could prove to be particularly unnerving for Cruz headed into this important next stretch against Trump. After Cruz’s big win in Iowa’s caucuses earlier this year, the reports of what his campaign organizers did that night to convince Dr. Ben Carson’s supporters to leave the world-renowned pediatric neurosurgeon’s team for the Texas senator’s team in the caucuses haunted him for weeks and created an opening for Trump to dominate the next several contests, as Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) lingered above Cruz for some time in several states, including South Carolina and Nevada.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/22/exclusive-disturbing-pattern-of-untruthfulness-team-kasich-says-ted-cruz-lying-about-new-york-ballot/

[ABX]

So a person said they heard a person tell another person that a person said  something to another person......

I think the degree of relationship to Kevin Bacon is closer.

[ABX]

I think the person who heard a person tell another person... and so on... got confused. It wasn't Cruz's people who have been saying this, it is Trump himself (not a surrogate either) about Pennsylvania.

PoliticsPA: Kasich says Trump spreading lies about Pa. ballot

With a challenge to his ballot petitions sitting in the PA Commonwealth Court, GOP presidential candidate John Kasich now has to contend with Donald Trump, after the frontrunner popped into the brewing controversy using his Twitter feed.

In a 25-word message to his large online following, the GOP surprise-of-the-century said Kasich should not be allowed to run in Ohio on Tuesday, since he “cannot run in the state of Pennsylvania” –

http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/news/2016/03/15/kasich-says-gop-trump-lying-pennsylvania-ballot.html

[Chosen Daughter]

I see HAPPY2BME is up to her old tricks.  Confusing story of he said she said.  A closed meeting and then a public speech in which the first part of the article is obviously proven untrue.

From the article:


Sam Nunberg—a New York Republican who previously advised Donald Trump’s campaign and is now unaffiliated but attended the Cruz meeting in Manhattan—told Breitbart News that Cruz didn’t say what Picket reported he said, or at least not in that context.

Nunberg said in a brief phone interview on Tuesday:

I attended the meeting. Sen. Cruz said that by the time the primary reaches New York, Kasich will have been out of the race because he is going to lose Arizona, he is going to lose Utah, and he is going to lose Wisconsin. He will have no rationale to be in the race and therefore should not be in the primary any longer. He never said in that room that Kasich was not on the ballot. Perhaps they should worry about winning another state besides Ohio.

“It came in the context of that by New York it should be a two-man race,” Nunberg added.
Picket has since updated her article to remove the claim she reported. “This post has been updated to reflect that John Kasich will appear on the NY Republican primary ballot,” her update reads.


So the article is a non-issue.  And what Cruz said is consistently true.  Kasich is just a hanging on kind of guy that is spoiling the vote.  It is obviously a two man race.

[Jazzhead]

So the article is a non-issue.  And what Cruz said is consistently true.  Kasich is just a hanging on kind of guy that is spoiling the vote.  It is obviously a two man race.

No, it's not, not when every poll out there says there's a third guy out there who can win in November, and the others will get smoked.

I said a while back that if Kasich could survive until the bluer states vote,  the other candidates might just cannibalize themselves.   Today's NY Post headline is TOTAL GUTTER MADNESS NOW.

Kasich - I'm stickin' 

[Chosen Daughter]

No, it's not, not when every poll out there says there's a third guy out there who can win in November, and the others will get smoked.

I said a while back that if Kasich could survive until the bluer states vote,  the other candidates might just cannibalize themselves.   Today's NY Post headline is TOTAL GUTTER MADNESS NOW.

Kasich - I'm stickin'

Yes it is a non issue.  It is false.  The article itself proves the first part of the article isn't verifiable and most probably untrue.

Cruz has every right to say that it is a two man race.  Kasich has not come through on votes or delegates.

[libertybele]

Just recently the challenge in PA was cleared for Kasich to appear on the ballot.  Perhaps he is facing challenges in NY?

[Jazzhead]

Kasich will be just another liberal offering by the GOP.  The last 2 failed.  So would Kasich.  I voted for McCain and was sorry i did.  I thought, "Well, at least he is not Romney."  So next they gave me Romney.  Now Trump?  I expect the next offering to be Howard Stern.  But Kasich is not even in the ballpark of acceptable to me.  I will not vote for any liberal no matter what team jersey he wears.

Good luck with Kasich.  You're on your own with that just as the ducklings are with Trump.

Sorry you feel that way,  RAT.   To me,  he's one of the original Reagan revolutionaries who's assembled a record of accomplishment that's second to none.   He's not a "liberal",  he's exactly the kind of conservative this country needs - growth oriented,  reform oriented,  able to inspire rather than divide.   He's got a record that spans thirty years - all I'd ask is that you give it an honest and dispassionate examination and compare what that record offers next to the current alternatives.       

[jmyrlefuller]

Just recently the challenge in PA was cleared for Kasich to appear on the ballot.  Perhaps he is facing challenges in NY?

Such challenges are routine in New York, but it's too late now. Cruz himself faced the birther challenges and all were thrown out.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

I wonder if anyone here will understand why I'm posting this.

[HonestJohn]

It's Breitbart... Salon would be truthful.