Author Topic: Non-partisan analyst flips 10 House races to favoring Democrats  (Read 418 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/house-races/273565-analysts-new-house-rankings-favor-dems-in-10-races#.VvP2sWpitC4.twitter

Non-partisan analyst flips 10 House races to favoring Democrats

By Scott Wong
March 18, 2016


House Democrats received a bit of good news on Friday: The nonpartisan Cook Political Report changed the ratings of 10 House races in Democrats’ favor.

And given the unpredictable nature of this cycle, the elections and campaigns newsletter said it could not be certain Republicans will hold the House in November.

“So many assumptions have been wrong this cycle that it's difficult to be definitive about another: that the House majority won't be in play in 2016,” wrote longtime Cook political analyst David Wasserman.

While a Donald Trump or Ted Cruz nomination “wouldn’t guarantee a down-ballot disaster,” Wasserman wrote, it would make congressional races much more difficult to predict, especially if Trump becomes the GOP standard bearer.

Here are the 10 Cook ratings changes that favored Democrats:

Freshman David Young (R-Iowa) moves from Lean R to Toss Up.

Freshman Rep. John Katko (R-N.Y.) moves from Lean R to Toss Up.

Freshman Rep. Barbara Comstock (R-Va.) moves from Likely R to Lean R.

Rep. Tom Reed (R-N.Y.) moves from Likely R to Lean R.

Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.) moves from Solid R to Likely R.

Rep. Brad Ashford (D-Neb.) moves from Toss Up to Lean D.

California Democratic Reps. Jim Costa, Pete Aguilar and Raul Ruiz all move from Likely D to Solid D.

Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D-Conn.) also moves from Likely D to Solid D.

Half of the shifts represent Democratic incumbents who are now safer; the other half are GOP incumbents who are now more threatened.

The ratings change in Reed’s upstate New York district came the same week that he endorsed Trump for president.

“Now is the time to unite behind the candidate who I believe will be our nominee, Donald Trump," Reed said in a statement.

But at least two other vulnerable Republicans, Reps. Carlos Curbelo (Fla.) and Bob Dold (Ill.), have made clear they won’t support the New York billionaire if he wins the nomination.

“I support just about anyone who isn't Trump,” Curbelo told The Hill this week.

Responding to the report, a spokeswoman for the House GOP’s campaign arm argued that Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton would drag down candidates in her party.

“Folks outside of the beltway understand that House Republicans have and will continue to work towards helping their constituents and being their voice in Washington,” said the National Republican Congressional Committee’s Katie Martin. “Frankly, House Democrats are ignoring the fact that they have a lack of talent when it comes to their candidates and members this cycle and the unfavorable Hillary Clinton at the top of the ticket will continue to tank their campaigns.”
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: Non-partisan analyst flips 10 House races to favoring Democrats
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2016, 02:43:20 pm »
Trump! Making America Rat Again!

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,295
Re: Non-partisan analyst flips 10 House races to favoring Democrats
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2016, 02:54:35 pm »
Batten down the hatches cause this will be rough. My predictions:

USSC = gone
Senate = gone
House = ... might manage to barely squeak out a hold if they're lucky
State legislatures = lose seats up and down ballots and state offices as well.